4 ms·
Is this pre-censored like their other later models?
by RobotToaster 3y ago
Is this pre-censored like their other later models?
- Remmy 3y agoYes.
- epups 3y agoNot sure why this is downvoted. This model is heavily censored by default.
- naillo 3y agoI've been playing with 0.9 and it can generate nude people so it seems not.
- Auracle 3y agoNo. From what I’ve gathered was trained on human anatomy, but not straight up porn. What they tried for 2.0/2.1 was way too overdone, to the point where if I prompted “princess Zelda,” the generation would only look mildly like her. Presumably they just didn’t have many images of people in the training. 1.5 and SDXL both work fine of that front. Fine tuners will quickly take it further, if that’s what you’re after.
- gettodachoppa 3y agoI don't think 1.x was trained on porn either? I seem to remember the issue with 2.x is that they removed all the commercial art from top-notch illustrators from the training data due to the backlash, so it was just way worse at generating great-looking things, which is all the user cares about. So the community stayed on their custom-trained models derived from SD 1.5 (which, yes, often included porn).
- Auracle 3y ago2.0 included a filter on the training data that removed all nudity. It went way too far and removed a lot of humans. They tried to rectify it a bit with 2.1 but even that was still hampered. What you said also happened, but the main thing was the base model didn't have a great concept of human anatomy. Apparently it was really hard to train for anything else as well.