4 ms·
Jesus.. It's really bleak. It's mostly a link to this website: https://servingnotice.com/Da29d1x/index.html https://servingnotice.com/Da29d1x/index.html Appa
by mikeyouse 3y ago
Jesus.. It's really bleak. It's mostly a link to this website:
https://servingnotice.com/Da29d1x/index.html https://servingnotice.com/Da29d1x/index.html
Apparently "Serving Notice dot com" is sufficient to say someone has been served?
I downloaded the Pacer documents with Recap enabled so you should be able to see them on the CourtListener website.
- gruez 3y ago>Apparently "Serving Notice dot com" is sufficient to say someone has been served? Apparently, because the judge allowed it. Looking at the relevant document[1], the reason that was allowed was that: 1. the defendant is foreign 2. "the defendants conducted their businesses over the Internet" 3. "the defendants used e-mail regularly in their businesses" 4. "the plaintiff shows e-mail is likely to reach defendants" [1] https://servingnotice.com/Da29d1x/015%20-%20221221%20[_]%20Order%20Granting%20Motion%20for%20Alt.%20Service.pdf https://servingnotice.com/Da29d1x/015%20-%20221221%20[_]%20O...
- sitkack 3y ago> 4. "the plaintiff shows e-mail is likely to reach defendants" JFC