20 ms·
Unicode Character “𝕏” (U+1D54F)
- 0x53 3y agoCan’t find it now, but originally it was reported that Elon got the logo from someone who replied to his tweet and that it was the lid logo for someone’s unsuccessful podcast.
- croes 3y agoPossibly related https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36845492 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36845492
- toxypol 3y agoso musk was trolled?
- bsuvc 3y agoNo, Musk is the one doing the trolling. Just look at the attention he is getting. If you think Musk is somehow upset about this, you are wrong.
- coffeebeqn 3y agoWow I feel so trolled that he’s lighting more of his money on fire. Buy an extremely well known brand for 44 billion and replace it with something you spend 5 minutes of effort on.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- asveikau 3y agoRight, it may look like he's making dumb decisions left and right and doesn't have anyone telling him how stupid he is to get him to stop, but he's really playing 4d chess. /s
- bsuvc 3y agoI didn't say any of that.
- Taek 3y agoThis character was added to Unicode in 2001, which notably is after Elon acquired x.com
- isodev 3y agoThe character is used by another famous piece of software for what, 40 years? https://x.org/wiki/ https://x.org/wiki/
- phkahler 3y agoBut X windows is dead or dying. Oh, so is Twitter?
- gpderetta 3y agoI expect that 𝕏11 will survive twitter. edit: using proper typography.
- avgcorrection 3y agoI hope not. I’m still using 𝕏Compose.
- rsynnott 3y agoReports of X11's death have been greatly exaggerated as far as I can see; it's still clinging stubbornly on, and efforts to kill it have tended not to go well.
- Maken 3y agoWayland is still trying really hard.
- layer8 3y agoX.org doesn’t use that character. But e.g. TeX probably did before Unicode.
- Denvercoder9 3y ago
- CodeCompost 3y agoAh so that's how we're supposed to Google for tweets now. "𝕏 something something".
- voxadam 3y ago𝕏 (U+1D54F) decomposes[0] to X (U+0058) meaning that if you search for 𝕏 your search string will likely be automatically converted to the equivalent X. Of course, while a search engine could conceivably index and search the entire Unicode codespace internet wide, such a task would likely be somewhat unrealistic and provide only limited upside. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_equivalence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_equivalence
- calderknight 3y agoi presume x.com or site:x.com will get the trick done
- PaulHoule 3y agoIt’s already got to search 1000s of Chinese characters, a few more doesn’t make a big difference.
- voxadam 3y agoHow do you decide which characters to index? The current Unicode release (15.0) includes 149,186 individual characters. I suppose you can probably ignore U+237C (Right Angle with Downwards Zigzag Arrow) seeing as nobody seems to know what it denotes.[0][1] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31012865 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31012865 [1] https://ionathan.ch/2022/04/09/angzarr.html https://ionathan.ch/2022/04/09/angzarr.html
- NoGravitas 3y agoThat is Ellis.
- PaulHoule 3y ago
- marmitesmuggler 3y agoStrongly reminds me of the X11 logo (one of my favourite designs).
- gjvc 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System yup
- simplicio 3y agoYea, kinda feels like X.org would have a decent trademark case if they wanted to pursue it. Both the name and logo are really similar, and it seems like both companies are operating in similar enough categories that its not too hard to imagine there being confusion between the two.
- AlexandrB 3y agoMusk has the deeper pockets. I'm more worried about him suing x.org and winning.
- pwdisswordfishc 3y agoI'm more worried about him suing x.org and losing, but still managing to bankrupt the foundation with legal expenses.
- Delk 3y agoMy first thought when simplicio mentioned trademark was that The Open Group -- which would seem to own the X Window System logo -- might need to try and protect their trademark. If they don't, it's easy to foresee how down the road the similarity could become their problem, not Musk's. The X.Org Foundation might need to do the same for their X logo even though it's a bit different (and I'm not sure if it's trademarked in the first place). IANAL, but you do need to defend a trademark in order to maintain it after all. Of course fighting to protect it would probably be costly and financially risky even if they did have a case.
- petercooper 3y agoDoes this affect the potential for trademarking the logo?
- samwillis 3y agoAbsolutely. They can probably trade mark it for social media (unless someone already has), but are highly unlikely to be able to trademark it broadly, which clearly is the intention.
- EspressoGPT 3y agoIsn't a trademark always tied to its respective business domain?
- samwillis 3y agoYes, but those "classes" can be quite wide, there is for example no way they could trademark it for "Class 9: Computer and software products and electrical and scientific products."
- Turing_Machine 3y agoWait until you find out about "apple" and "windows".
- samwillis 3y agoApple and windows are trademarks for software. You would be unable to get the trademark "Apple" for a company selling fruit, or "windows" for a window fitter, and neither could Apple or Microsoft. 𝕏 is a pre-existing symbol used by, and part of a standard character set for, software. You could probably get a trademark on it for a company selling apples, but I highly doubt you could for a software company.
- bawolff 3y ago
- jonas-w 3y agoYou can also access x.com when using the Unicode Character https://𝕏.com https://xn--971h.com (𝕏.com)
- mkl 3y agoAre you sure? When I type https://xn--971h.com https://xn--971h.com in it doesn't work, but clicking the link in your comment does because HN has made the href x.com. The browser converts 𝕏.com to x.com before going there too. Moreover, X and 𝕏 are treated as equivalent characters in this context, so whois 𝕏.com looks up x.com, and 𝕏.com's punycode encoding is x.com: https://www.whatsmydns.net/idn-punycode-converter?q=%F0%9D%95%8F.com https://www.whatsmydns.net/idn-punycode-converter?q=%F0%9D%9... whois xn--971h.com returns the same thing as an unregistered domain.
- jonas-w 3y agoHN automatically converts these urls to punycode, maybe this is a bug and it automatically converts everything to punycode even though it doesn't make sense?
- mkl 3y agoI think so. Then I'm not right about the punycode encoding of 𝕏.com - it's that it isn't even needed. I've emailed dang about it.
- yreg 3y agoIt's unrelated to HN. Copy pasting 𝕏.com into the address bar still leads to x.com related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack
- mkl 3y agoI already mentioned that, and it's not what they mean. Hover your mouse over a https://xn--971h.com https://xn--971h.com link in a comment on HN and notice that it's pointing to https://x.com https://x.com. This does seem to be an HN thing; see here: https://jsfiddle.net/rtfhejdy/ https://jsfiddle.net/rtfhejdy/
- dietrichepp 3y agoThis is for math. In Latex, you get these symbols with \mathbb{}. They are most commonly used to represent to represent number sets, like the set of all integers Z (from the German), set of all natural numbers N, set of complex numbers C, set of all real numbers R, rationals Q (for “quotient”), set of quaternions H (named after Hamilton), or an unknown set F (for “field”). This explains why many of the letters in this series exist in the basic multilingual plane—because R is very commonly used, but A is not. You can find ℝ in the basic multilingual plane at U+211D. I don’t know why people are interested in the X symbol. It’s just there to complete the alphabet. There are many other ranges like this used for writing mathematical formulas, like the range of bold letters, fraktur, script, etc.
- orlp 3y ago𝕏 is used as a symbol for a generic metric space. E.g. if your result is generic over ℝ², ℂ³, etc, you can write 𝕏.
- dietrichepp 3y agoThanks! I am always a little curious about how these symbols are used. That makes perfect sense to me.
- red_trumpet 3y agoI'm a PhD student in algebraic geometry and have seldom seen this. IME "X" is a generic name for all kinds of spaces (metric, topological, complex analytic, algebraic...), but I don't remember ever having seen "𝕏". That said, in principal everyone is free to call their spaces how they like. It just makes it easier to read if one sticks to familiar notation.
- orlp 3y agoYou're right I should've used "as a symbol" not "as the symbol". It's not terribly common.
- 3y ago
- albybisy 3y agoso it can't be copyrighted.
- Zambyte 3y agoLogos never could be. You're thinking of trademark.
- papercrane 3y agoSome logos can be copyrighted. Most logos however don't meet the threshold of originality. The Copyright Office will reject copyrights for stylized letters (see IBM logo), or logos of simple geometric shapes. With the modern aesthetic for logos to be as simple as possible this means nearly all the logos you see are not copyrighted.
- gorlilla 3y agoIt can be probably be trademarked though.
- GaggiX 3y agoI use this X character in my name on Telegram, now everyone will think I'm an Elon stan.
- Zambyte 3y agoJust change your name to the Twitter bird
- kevin_thibedeau 3y agoThe Fail Finch?
- Y-bar 3y ago"No way! Why should he change? Musk’s the one who sucks!"
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- wigster 3y agoappropriate the new name is the universal symbol for close application
- NoZebra120vClip 3y agoI've started telling people to "just 𝕏 out that window." You can hear the outline typeface in my voice.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- samwillis 3y agoIt makes typesetting easer, pretty genius really! /s We're going to see a trend of companies using Unicode characters for their logo now aren't we?...
- gorlilla 3y agoI still will prefer a mix of comic sans and wingdings.
- bhouston 3y agoI am not sure you can trademark the Unicode mark though. Doesn’t this preclude trademarks then?
- cubefox 3y agoI mean, hugging face exists.
- tsukikage 3y ago...which leads, of course, to the question of whether, with the application of a suitable sum of money, one can get one's chosen logo added to the unicode standard.
- yaakov34 3y agoCan someone explain what we are talking about here? Something having to do with Musk's son's name?
- superhumanuser 3y agoTwitter is rebranding to X.
- PaulHoule 3y agoDoes this have anything to do with the cage fight/dick measuring content with Zuckerberg? I think almost everybody thought renaming Facebook to Meta was a bad idea, but maybe Musk knows something we don’t. ;-)
- sebzim4500 3y ago> I think almost everybody thought renaming Facebook to Meta was a bad idea Do they? Why? I don't see how it did any harm, and people are way more willing to admit an association with Meta than with Facebook.
- PaulHoule 3y agoWhen it first happened I thought they were trying to evade Facebook’s bad reputation for privacy and politics and made a point to keep calling it Facebook. After about a year “Meta” had the same stink of death around it as NFTs and I figured I’d be doing it no favor by calling it by its preferred name.
- tehbeard 3y agoI thought 'Meta' was the same shuffle Google did with 'Alphabet', some of financial / legal shenanigans.. Though speaking of while trawling the wiki page on Alphabet.... > X (formerly Google X) is an American semi-secret research and development facility and organization founded by Google in January 2010.
- reneberlin 3y agoAlso the game: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-COM https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-COM
- spread_love 3y agoI can see users misreading this as a "close" icon in the "share on..." section of every article
- pohl 3y ago[flagged]
- NoGravitas 3y agoI thought it was U+130B8.
- pohl 3y agoGetting a proposal for a sufficiently flaccid variant approved by the Unicode Technical Committee was too big a lift.
- petesergeant 3y agoThat’s a swastika for anyone who doesn’t particularly want it to show up on their screen in a public place
- lifthrasiir 3y agoIt's actually time for someone to adopt this character [1] at the gold level ($5,000), which is only allowed for the single entity and doesn't expire---so that X.com doesn't have a chance to sponsor the character at the same level. [1] https://home.unicode.org/adopt-a-character/about-adopt-a-character/ https://home.unicode.org/adopt-a-character/about-adopt-a-cha...
- exegete 3y ago>All sponsors are acknowledged in Sponsors of Adopted Characters and our public Twitter feed and will receive a custom digital badge for their character. Wait, do they mean their public X feed?
- bhouston 3y agoWho cares if x.com sponsors it? In fact they should because emojis are so popular on it and Unicode could use the fund. Why should someone try to get this? What is their benefit?
- Izkata 3y agoBecause it's trendy to hate on Elon.
- dsr_ 3y agoIf he stopped making egregiously terrible decisions in public, the attention would stop.
- adolph 3y agoThus far there is a positive correlation between “egregiously terrible decisions” (ETD) and attention. From a naive perspective the attention is caused by ETD. However it may be worthwhile to test the alternative hypothesis that ETD are attempts to increase attention. Maybe ETD fit within a larger set of “Attention Seeking Behavior” (ASB). To the degree that ASB is “rewarded” with any feedback at all, even negative, then it will be reënforced. Enjoying the attention of others is socially acceptable in some situations. However, an excessive need for attention can lead to difficulties in interpersonal relationships. However, as a tactical method, it is often used in combat, theatre (upstaging) and it is fundamental to marketing. One strategy often used by teachers and behavior analysts to counter various types of attention-seeking behavior is planned or tactical ignoring. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_seeking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_seeking
- neom 3y agoAnyone have any knowledge of how the new CEO and Elons relationship is regarding the business? I'd be curious how the conversation goes with her about this kinda stuff.
- TheCleric 3y agoI'm assuming it's "I own the company, do this." Not saying I agree with his ownership style (I certainly don't), but if you become a CEO for a company owned by Musk, and are not expecting him to undermine and interfere, than you are fooling only yourself.
- drexlspivey 3y agoHe hired her a couple months ago. He has been public about building the X “everything app” for a while. Presumably she already knew about that when she took the role.
- spuz 3y agoThe BBC reports: > Ms Yaccarino wrote on the platform that the rebrand was an exciting new opportunity. > "Twitter made one massive impression and changed the way we communicate," she said.
- brrtbrrt 3y ago[dead]
- teeray 3y agoI can't wait for a Twitter vs. Xfinity trademark showdown.
- ectospheno 3y agox.com was a company he founded early 1999. He wanted an online bank. Wikipedia page on it is informative.
- dizzydes 3y agoMusk can seem to do no right atm, I see a lot of hate out there with this name change and planned product expansion but I can’t quite understand why. He’s taking an underperforming social network and trying to make it work. It might prove fatal, but it would have died a slow boring death in its old form. Perhaps its just that people don’t like his personality, which shouldn’t come into it. Fwiw even prior to his defunding moderation it felt like one of the meanest places on the internet, I don’t see much of a change.
- outsidetheparty 3y agoBecause he keeps having these late-night binges of bizarre, brand-destroying decision making. Twitter is underperforming as a result of his previous rounds of bizarre, brand- and product-destroying decision making. Twitter wasn't dying until he came along to "fix" it. Yeah, his personality is plenty objectionable too, but it's mostly the way he's seemingly intentionally running the company into the ground that I object to.
- oneeyedpigeon 3y agoIt's very hard not to take his personality into it since he chooses to force it in there. However, trying to be a bit dispassionate for a second, I'd say the haphazard nature of the changes are what really gets to people. Especially those who depend on Twitter as a tool, not knowing what it will be called tomorrow, how it will function, which parts will work and which wont, etc. is quite a deal-breaker.
- rlglwx 3y agoTwitter was doing fine. By taking it private, he saddled it with massive debt its current revenue couldn’t service. And every decision thereafter has been half baked and poorly executed. So by trying to “save” it, he’s killing it much quicker than if it had just been left alone.
- Turing_Machine 3y ago> Twitter was doing fine. It was losing $4 million per day.
- phito 3y agoWhy is this a thread and not just a comment on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36845111 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36845111 ?
- myfonj 3y agoInterestingly, [w3.org Math Double struck] shows example glyph rendering with swapped double stroke stem ("//" + "\" instead of "\\" + "/"). Been looking what the "opf" in the `𝕏` HTML entity name of this kind of character means, and apparently it is "Open Face". It is referenced at [wikipedia Blackboard bold] that mentions that "𝕏 Occasionally used to denote an arbitrary metric space. " [w3.org Math Double struck]: https://www.w3.org/Math/characters/double-struck.html https://www.w3.org/Math/characters/double-struck.html [wikipedia Blackboard bold]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackboard_bold https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackboard_bold
- stOneskull 3y agoan exception to every rule.. look at these beauties.. https://www.fontspace.com/category/blackboard-bold https://www.fontspace.com/category/blackboard-bold transatlantic cruise is super swell
- mlochbaum 3y agoI'm responsible for this character being supported in Iosevka, JetBrains Mono, 3270, and Cozette, looks like. For arguments I wanted to stick to mathematical convention like f(x) without looking like a regular variable. While the lowercase 𝕩 (subject role) is more common, uppercase makes it a function and is useful in functional programming. More visibility for the character is helpful if it means wider font support, although the real sticking point has been lousy UTF-16 handling on Windows. Like most emoji, these characters need to be represented as a surrogate pair in UTF-16, and terminals in particular often don't handle it. https://mlochbaum.github.io/BQN/fonts.html https://mlochbaum.github.io/BQN/fonts.html https://mlochbaum.github.io/BQN/help/rightargument.html https://mlochbaum.github.io/BQN/help/rightargument.html
- claudiawerner 3y agoThat's funny; I immediately thought of BQN when I saw this character pop up on HN :)
- hoosieree 3y agoHaha, same here. I think my brain actually translated the title to "Unicode Character (right argument as a function)".
- mlochbaum 3y agoMisremembered about Iosevka: I requested support for a few other BQN characters after noticing it already had the double-struck ones (https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka/issues/870 https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka/issues/870). The other three were requests or contributions (drew 3270's 𝕏 myself!) explicitly in connection with BQN.
- creativeembassy 3y agoI wasn't familiar with BQN. Clicked through, reminded me of APL. "OH", I thought, "I see how you came up with the name." There was a (disproven) urban legend about Arthur C. Clarke's 2001, where "HAL" was secretly a reference to "IBM", where you transpose each letter by one. H + 1 = I A + 1 = B L + 1 = M Man, BQN is a clever name. Because, A + 1 = B P + 1 = Q L + 1 = M... ...well crap. That theory didn't pan out at all. Needlessly disappointed myself upon hearing that it's short for "Big Questions Notation".
- ricardo81 3y agoA good bandwidth saver then, even for the 'share this' kind of plugins that exist.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- golemotron 3y agoThe Southern Poverty Law Center will declare this a hate symbol shortly. Mark my words.
- jjgreen 3y agoInteresting comment on the Register (by Jedit): However, it's also exactly identical to Unicode character 1D54F - because that's all it is. And if you examine the full "X" logo in detail, you'll notice that the scratch in the background doesn't reach the X because all the logo creator did was put U+1D54F in a black square and slap it onto the backdrop. It's the epitome of laziness. https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2023/07/24/twitter_brand/#c_4700793 https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2023/07/24/twitter_...
- cubefox 3y agoWhen it comes to logos, I'm all in favor of laziness. People get way too hung up on something that unimportant.
- illwrks 3y agoIn most instances it's unimportant, until there's a legal requirement for it to be unique and trademarked. What's to stop me mass-producing merchandise with that symbol on it right now?
- quietbritishjim 3y ago> you'll notice that the scratch in the background doesn't reach the X What does this mean? I've tried finding various images of the X logo on news sites and twitter.com itself and I don't see anything resembling a "scratch in the background" but maybe I'm just missing something obvious.
- app4soft 3y ago> Looking forward to #Musk trying to trademark a Unicode symbol, in this case 𝕏 :) Maybe we should start using #x1D54F as the new Hashtag for everything #Twitter and #X #𝕏 :)[0] [0] https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/110768919254064477 https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/110768919254064477
- gabugabu 3y agoBeautiful. :):):):)
- pluc 3y agoI can't wait to x about this. Y'all re-x me when you see it.
- qingcharles 3y agoI tried hitting the X button to re-x you but the browser window closed.
- numpad0 3y agoAm I supposed to not notice this mastodon in the room...
- KingLancelot 3y ago[dead]
- danso 3y agoThese tweets by @SawyerMerritt seem to have been the "inspiration" for X's logo: https://twitter.com/SawyerMerritt/status/1683150433806692352 https://twitter.com/SawyerMerritt/status/1683150433806692352 Correction to my previous reply: @ajtourville designed the thicker X logo below for our (now discontinued) @OfficialXPod. The thicker logo was inspired by a font he found online (bottom right). I created the video above using the font logo, adding a glow and little lines in the logo to make it look “imperfect." https://twitter.com/ajtourville/status/1683151957723160576 https://twitter.com/ajtourville/status/1683151957723160576 Correct. This is the logo I designed and, if @elonmusk wants, he can have it for free. Maybe I haven't had enough coffee, but the allegedly "designed" thicker X, "inspired by a font [Alex] found online", seems to be exactly the unicode 𝕏, but bold? And this Alex guy is taking the credit for designing it?
- yreg 3y agoSo what, it's still a logo design.
- ChrisArchitect 3y agoOh the Accessibility hawks at accounts like MathAbuse (https://twitter.com/MathAbuse https://twitter.com/MathAbuse) fighting Unicode 'fancy text' are gonna love this
- astrange 3y agoIt's strange they think computers don't have the ability to read text just because it looks fancier.
- ChrisArchitect 3y agoNot computers - humans with accessibility needs, screen readers and such. Someone posting "I'm trying to Tweet on the new 𝕏" will read in audio as "I'm trying to Tweet on the new mathematical symbol x".... think of how any of those fun tweet texts with fancy italicized words made from math symbols read like.... it's brutal
- astrange 3y agoSure, but they should just fix the screen reader instead of working around it.
- simbolit 3y agoThis. Convincing a dozen or so screen reader developers to deal with this is an achievable goal. It is much much much harder to bring millions of twitt...X users to change their typographic habits.
- deafpolygon 3y agoMight want to hide this character from Elon... shh.
- m3kw9 3y agoSo Elon can copy write this?
- ZachSaucier 3y agoAs far as I know, for something like this you can only copyright the specific application. So for example it couldn't be used for social media sites.
- laserbeam 3y agoCopyright, no. Trademark, maybe, but won't be easy.
- alexruf 3y agoWow, this probably changes everything we thought we knew about this company, the product and its CEO. No, seriously, does he think no one notices that the new X logo still hides the same old Twitter crap?
- hcarvalhoalves 3y ago> X is the future state of unlimited interactivity – centered in audio, video, messaging, payments/banking – creating a global marketplace for ideas, goods, services, and opportunities. Powered by AI, X will connect us all in ways we’re just beginning to imagine. Audio, Video, Messaging, Payments and AI, all in a single product pitch. I guess then "X" is an appropriate brand for something that even the owner doesn't know WTF is about.
- pwdisswordfishc 3y agoIn other words, X is the new blockchain.
- Dig1t 3y agoBasically Google
- morkalork 3y agogmail, gmaps, gmeet, gchat...
- floren 3y agohttps://zombo.com/ https://zombo.com/ You can do anything at X.com, anything at all!
- tiltowait 3y agoAn "everything app" sounds a lot like what I understand WeChat to be. Can't say I want it, but it's not without precedent, apparently.
- hakfoo 3y agoI'd love to see someone explain the WeChat mystique for people who aren't in its target ecosystem. It seems like, if you're making something flexible enough to handle payments, various social and interactive services, and yet somehow fall short of being a full web browser, haven't you just reinvented Prodigy for the 2020s? I assume at this point it largely runs on momentum in a Facebookesque way-- it no longer has to be particularly food at any given service because the sheer mass of its userbase will make it a major player in every market it goes near. But that doesn't explain initial success. Was it catapulted by a specific environmental condition (i. e. they got zero-rated at a point where mobile data was too expensive to just choose random websites to browse?) or a dramatically better ergonomic experience?
- pionerkotik 3y ago𝕋𝕎𝕀𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ
- jheriko 3y agoi refuse to upvote this whilst its on 314 points... im not sure why this is of import either. blackboard X, so what?
- PeterCorless 3y agoThis latest kerfuffle is as silly as the time someone actually got a trademark on π. https://www.wired.com/2014/05/pi-takedown/ https://www.wired.com/2014/05/pi-takedown/
- gweinberg 3y agoI see on the page there are also unicode symbols for roman numerals IX, X, and XI. I can see an argument for having a separate character for roman numeral X as opposed to just using a capital X like a normal person would, but where do they get off calling IX and XI numerals? They are two-character sequences, and adding characters for the combinations sounds like all pain and no gain.
- cushpush 3y agoit's actually unicode?!
- michaelsbradley 3y agoAlso on codepoints.net: https://codepoints.net/U+1D54F https://codepoints.net/U+1D54F