3 ms·

Yeah, I second this. If anything, the process in the video is painfully under-optimized. It's not that hard to get to the point where you have a few machines

by edrxty 3y ago

Yeah, I second this. If anything, the process in the video is painfully under-optimized. It's not that hard to get to the point where you have a few machines in a lights out warehouse with a skeleton staff somewhere spitting these things out like a machine gun. I am curious what this legendary machined part referring to is though....?

ReptileMan 3y ago
>I am curious what this legendary machined part referring to is though....? Ultra silent propellers for submarines most probably.
- chii 3y ago
  > submarines which makes all the difference. The military is willing to pay at a rate that civilians will not.
  - lostlogin 3y ago
    Some civilians paid a lot for their submarine experience.
  - thumbuddy 3y ago
    Meanwhile there was that scandal about the steel being sold and used for us submarines was suboptimal. Erosion of standards at pretty much every level...
Closi 3y ago
> If anything, the process in the video is painfully under-optimized. It's not that hard to get to the point where you have a few machines in a lights out warehouse with a skeleton staff somewhere spitting these things out like a machine gun. This may very well be the trap that they fell into though - at $90 million that implies that they went head-first into scale and automation where actually it can sometimes be better to aim for something less automated as a version 1.0 (humans are more flexible than machinery)