3 ms·
Determining value is the value of money. Without it we might get too busy making paperclips and forget to feed people all the same. It's a crude system, more a
by c22 3y ago
Determining value is the value of money. Without it we might get too busy making paperclips and forget to feed people all the same.
It's a crude system, more ad-hoc evolved than intelligently designed, and definitely historically manipulated at every chance. Nonetheless, anyone who lobbies for the dissolution of our monetary systems can't be taken seriously unless they also are arguing for a suitable replacement of this functionality.
In the past, systems that relied on the opinions of a small group or single individual to determine the value of different types of production to society have failed spectacularly so the solution will need to be more robust than that.
- freeone3000 3y agoPeople are starving in the streets. I think this is a more spectacular failure than chandeliers produced by weight.
- nradov 3y agoFewer people are starving than ever before, all because of capitalism. What alternative are you proposing? You are always welcome to donate food to the hungry, as many of us do.
- freeone3000 3y agoAh yes, when I give food to the poor I’m a good person, when the person who profits off of the sale of food (record profits in 2022!) is morally neutral.