But they didn't even explain what FUIF or PIK might be in that section or even the entire article! To understand that article required me searching for FUIF [1

But they didn't even explain what FUIF or PIK might be in that section or even the entire article! To understand that article required me searching for FUIF [1], PIK [2] and a brief explanation of what JPEG XL is trying to achieve. I double down on my "complaint" - I'd call it constructive criticism - that article was poorly written. It's actually quite a good story that their Free Universal Image Format (FUIF) has achieved what it has. That's a great acronym, especially for a world that thinks JPEG XL is a good acronym! Why not put in in the article. To save anyone else time: [1] https://github.com/cloudinary/fuif https://github.com/cloudinary/fuif [2] https://github.com/google/pik https://github.com/google/pik