4 ms·
Now YC has funded 4 companies directly competing with each other. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25991485 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25991485 L
by welder 3y ago
Now YC has funded 4 companies directly competing with each other.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25991485 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25991485 Launch HN: Opstrace (YC S19) – open-source Datadog
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22376732 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22376732 Launch HN: PostHog (YC W20) – open-source product analytics
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26079389 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26079389 Launch HN: SigNoz (YC W21) – Open-source alternative to DataDog
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36774611 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36774611 Launch HN: Highlight.io (YC W23) – Open-source, full stack web app monitoring
The monitoring space is heating up after the Datadog IPO.
Edit 2023-07-18T22:42:00Z: added PostHog
- prabhatsharma 3y agoOutside of YC you have OpenObserve - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36280028 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36280028
- podoman 3y agoOpstrace was acquired by GitLab soon after launch. And signoz, in our minds is more leaning towards Grafana/Prometheus (and not particularly web app oriented). I’m personally excited by the fact that there are other players in the space. It pushes us to move quickly and stay focused. And I agree with your analysis, Datadog has proven that there’s a huge (and only growing) market for observability tooling.
- welder 3y agoGood take on the competition, and I'm looking forward to trying out Highlight.io.
- podoman 3y agoExcited for you to give it a try.
- pranay01 3y ago(SigNoz maintainer here) I would say the key way we differ from Grafana stack, is that we have all metrics, traces and logs in a single application while in grafana you would have to run 2 different products for this and then work your way to make sure that the three products are able to talk to each other. One can easily monitor their JS based frontend application in SigNoz today, but yes we are focused primarily on tying together metrics, traces and logs today - and have a pretty powerful exceptions monitoring product built on top of traces. We don't do things like session recording etc today :)
- bobolino123 3y agoAlso PostHog
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- catsarebetter 3y agoOn top of indiehacker tools like fathom, plausible, etc. Market is huge
- cpursley 3y agohttps://openreplay.com https://openreplay.com is also great. Has helped us detect issues in our US as well as trace graphql requests.
- mdaniel 3y agowhew https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/blob/v1.14.0/LICENSE https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/blob/v1.14.0/LICENS... contains multitudes :-( OpenReplay monorepo uses multiple licenses. Portions of this software are licensed as follows: - All content that resides under the "ee/" directory of this repository, is licensed under the license defined in "ee/LICENSE". - Some directories have a specific LICENSE file and are licensed under the "MIT" license, as defined below. - Content outside of the above mentioned directories or restrictions defaults to the "Elastic License 2.0 (ELv2)" license, as defined below.
- zX41ZdbW 3y agoInteresting fact - all four are using ClickHouse, which is my favorite technology.
- fakedang 3y agoClickhouse is insanely good for OLAP type data. But I've found it flexible enough to even be a suitable substitute to time series data.
- Aeolun 3y agoI find that clickhouse is absurdly fast for massive amounts of small items. Since that’s what all of these are, it’s not super surprising.
- podoman 3y agoOne more thing to add here given your edit. Posthog does not directly compete with us. They have a session replay product; that is the only overlap. Nonetheless, their work on session replay (and in turn, with rrweb) is making the ecosystem better overall.
- pranay01 3y agoAgree, I think PostHog adresses a very different set of use cases