5 ms·
Sourcehut may have advantages but I just can't get past the design. I need some fun in my products and this feels like an abandoned village. This is a bad reas
by DoesntMatter22 3y ago
Sourcehut may have advantages but I just can't get past the design. I need some fun in my products and this feels like an abandoned village.
This is a bad reason to not use it I admit
- yankput 3y agoI can’t get over the PR handling with git send-email. I know, it’s “how git is supposed to be used” or whatever, but it makes it just worse. I can’t decide if it’s worse or better than gerrit though. Every time I need to use gerrit for some google stuff, I want to punch my screen.
- nativecoinc 3y agoThere are even a few regular contributors on the Git project who complain about the workflow being `git send-email`/email centered.
- sooperserieous 3y agoYou need git-review[1] to make Gerrit usage sane... [1] https://opendev.org/opendev/git-review https://opendev.org/opendev/git-review
- DoesntMatter22 3y agoGod man, Gerrit, I haven't heard that name in a looong time.
- yankput 3y agoYou don’t contribute to Google projects then.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoThe design is one of my favorite things about sourcehut. It's clean, to the point, and doesn't get in the way. (Of course, taste is subjective, so this is just me offering a different view, not saying you're "wrong".)
- DoesntMatter22 3y agoI agree, there is nothing "wrong" with it. It's just not for me.