3 ms·
Kind of a shame they didn't include Safari. But it's good to see Firefox has managed to climb to the second place.
by isodev 3y ago
Kind of a shame they didn't include Safari. But it's good to see Firefox has managed to climb to the second place.
- agloe_dreams 3y agoHeh, yeah I enjoy that this is the missing context. It really does show progress though for Firefox. It's like "The Cubs beat the Yankees in the World Series! (But the Astros actually won the World Series)"
- magicalist 3y agoSafari is slower, though? From the sibling comment: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/graphs?highlightAlerts=1&highlightChangelogData=1&highlightCommonAlerts=0&series=autoland,3924422,1,13&series=mozilla-central,4561128,1,13&series=mozilla-central,3736699,1,13&timerange=2592000 https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/graphs?highlightAl...
- cpeterso 3y agoHere are the Speedometer results for Firefox, Chrome, and Safari on macOS: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/graphs?highlightAlerts=1&highlightChangelogData=1&highlightCommonAlerts=0&series=autoland,3924422,1,13&series=mozilla-central,4561128,1,13&series=mozilla-central,3736699,1,13&timerange=2592000 https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/graphs?highlightAl...