3 ms·

Anyone care to explain why they downvoted this?

• crote 3y ago
  Probably because "training" implies direct and constant supervision, which would almost completely avoid any chance of incidents because the human is in charge at all times. Deploying an unsupervised robot on the general public for training purposes is even worse than for testing purposes.
  • peterisza 3y ago
    Why? If it is already safer than human drivers (as they claim), training and testing are both okay. Not even just okay, but a good thing!
    • aluminum96 3y ago
      > If it is already safer than human drivers (as they claim) They are not safer. They are constantly behaving like this: - https://twitter.com/desertflyer/status/1677464706251128832 https://twitter.com/desertflyer/status/1677464706251128832 - https://twitter.com/flrent/status/1677483882109882368 https://twitter.com/flrent/status/1677483882109882368