4 ms·

I will probably get sniped by someone who actually knows what they're talking about (please correct me if I'm wrong :D), but my impression of the T issues is le

I will probably get sniped by someone who actually knows what they're talking about (please correct me if I'm wrong :D), but my impression of the T issues is less a funding issue, and more a competency/corruption issue. We're building above-ground rail at underground rail prices for one example problem.

ezfe 3y ago
It's certainly a mix of both, but the T has been underfunding maintenance and repair work in favor of the big capital projects that are demanded of it. That is a funding issue, even if there are many more issues to add to that.
ke88y 3y ago
I toured a piece of property at the border of Charlestown and Somerville near a big T stop. There was an empty lot next to the tracks that was owned by the MBTA on paper. But de facto, the neighbor and was clearly using the entire massive lot as an extended back yard (they even had a garden shed and paved parking on the MBTA owned lot). Looked up the property records. Either a HIGHLY coincidental name clash, or there's a recently retired T exec who has been using MBTA land as an extended back yard and off-street parking area. That's the moment I gave up on Boston and the T, tbh. It's a small thing that doesn't really matter, but so ridiculously brazen and public and personal. If that sort of thing is what happens out in the open, can you imagine how many tens/hundreds of millions of taxpayer money is being funneled between friends and cousins via MBTA?
- davisr 3y ago
  Perkins St. gang represent!
- teeray 3y ago
  > they even had a garden shed and paved parking on the MBTA owned lot Sounds like that neighbor has a solid adverse possession argument to make.
  - ke88y 3y ago
    Unlikely. There's a specific exclusion for railroad land in MA's adverse possession statute.
- ke88y 3y ago
  e: the above is just my perception, I don't actually know if there's a land use agreement etc happening, but it certainly has exactly the sort of sketchy appearance at least for me.
- doctorwho42 3y ago
  If you are talking about a triangle shaped lot on the corner, which is across the street from the lichmere stop of the green line... That lot was the lichmere stop of the green line until about two years ago. And was the lichmere stop for decades. Once torn down it was used as a gravel pile and support area for MBTA work. Recently that corner had the traffic pattern altered a bit with a new light and cross street. You gotta remember, in America city infrastructure takes time. Lot in question: https://maps.app.goo.gl/4HSueRhVb8TPZNoZ7 https://maps.app.goo.gl/4HSueRhVb8TPZNoZ7
  - ke88y 3y ago
    > Lechmere Nope. I was talking about Sullivan. davisr got it right.
  - lovich 3y ago
    I’m surprised that gone done already. Haven’t been in the area since 2021. You can even see n the street view just moving back and forth the tracks on one side of the street and then the other.
BenFranklin100 3y ago
You’re not wrong. Public sector unions in MA are corrupt. It’s an unfortunate side effect of MA’s one party rule. Unions have the Democratic party in their hip pocket and no politician dare cross them.

ezfe 3y ago

It's certainly a mix of both, but the T has been underfunding maintenance and repair work in favor of the big capital projects that are demanded of it. That is a funding issue, even if there are many more issues to add to that.

ke88y 3y ago

I toured a piece of property at the border of Charlestown and Somerville near a big T stop. There was an empty lot next to the tracks that was owned by the MBTA on paper. But de facto, the neighbor and was clearly using the entire massive lot as an extended back yard (they even had a garden shed and paved parking on the MBTA owned lot). Looked up the property records. Either a HIGHLY coincidental name clash, or there's a recently retired T exec who has been using MBTA land as an extended back yard and off-street parking area. That's the moment I gave up on Boston and the T, tbh. It's a small thing that doesn't really matter, but so ridiculously brazen and public and personal. If that sort of thing is what happens out in the open, can you imagine how many tens/hundreds of millions of taxpayer money is being funneled between friends and cousins via MBTA?

davisr 3y ago
Perkins St. gang represent!
teeray 3y ago
> they even had a garden shed and paved parking on the MBTA owned lot Sounds like that neighbor has a solid adverse possession argument to make.
- ke88y 3y ago
  Unlikely. There's a specific exclusion for railroad land in MA's adverse possession statute.
ke88y 3y ago
e: the above is just my perception, I don't actually know if there's a land use agreement etc happening, but it certainly has exactly the sort of sketchy appearance at least for me.
doctorwho42 3y ago
If you are talking about a triangle shaped lot on the corner, which is across the street from the lichmere stop of the green line... That lot was the lichmere stop of the green line until about two years ago. And was the lichmere stop for decades. Once torn down it was used as a gravel pile and support area for MBTA work. Recently that corner had the traffic pattern altered a bit with a new light and cross street. You gotta remember, in America city infrastructure takes time. Lot in question: https://maps.app.goo.gl/4HSueRhVb8TPZNoZ7 https://maps.app.goo.gl/4HSueRhVb8TPZNoZ7
- ke88y 3y ago
  > Lechmere Nope. I was talking about Sullivan. davisr got it right.
- lovich 3y ago
  I’m surprised that gone done already. Haven’t been in the area since 2021. You can even see n the street view just moving back and forth the tracks on one side of the street and then the other.

BenFranklin100 3y ago

You’re not wrong. Public sector unions in MA are corrupt. It’s an unfortunate side effect of MA’s one party rule. Unions have the Democratic party in their hip pocket and no politician dare cross them.