4 ms·
If you understand SQL enough to know if the query ChatGPT produced is valid - you probably could have written it yourself. I don’t see how prompting chatgpt an
by jmuguy 3y ago
If you understand SQL enough to know if the query ChatGPT produced is valid - you probably could have written it yourself. I don’t see how prompting chatgpt and testing its results is faster or better than just writing SQL.
- nonethewiser 3y ago> If you understand SQL enough to know if the query ChatGPT produced is valid Like I said, you need to test it. Not read it. Test it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Mustachio 3y agoImo it depends on what you're prompting. If you yourself do not fully understand what you want and/or which information you have to provide for the model to 'understand' enough context, prompts will not give good results. I usually find ChatGPT very good for converting conceptual ideas to a concrete piece of 'boilerplate' to work off of. It can help you jump gaps in your proces, but in the end you still have to make the jumps yourself.
- d0mine 3y agoI can recognize much more faces than I can describe/draw. It is easier to read foreign language than to write it (active vs passive vocabulary). It is the same with googling, looking for a solution on StackOverflow: understanding/judging whether the solution is good may be faster than constructing it yourself.