2 ms·
What I'm saying is treat the board as a development harness to get your project going. If you have issues with the processor don't take it up with the board mak
by joezydeco 3y ago
What I'm saying is treat the board as a development harness to get your project going. If you have issues with the processor don't take it up with the board maker because they're usually just as clueless. The exception would be boards like RPi or Beagle where the designers are tight with or owned by the chipmakers themselves.
- jvanderbot 3y agoRight, which is what GP was saying: stick to those that are able to support longer than zero time horizon.
- joezydeco 3y agoBut the fundamental difference here is that most people buying SBCs are treating them as self-contained COTS compute modules. As someone that has worked with these EVKs for decades, you never treated them as part of your final product. But with the advent of Beagle and RPI, that's where we are now. But when you buy an RPi or Beaglebone as the core of your industrial smelter and expect support for that module comparable to, say, a module from Kontron? You're going to be disappointed.
- jvanderbot 3y agoSupport is the S in IOT.
- HeyLaughingBoy 3y agoI thought that.... oh, Security is the other S. Got it!
- snvzz 3y agoIdentity is the Id in IdIoT.