4 ms·
It's been slow, but I've noticed a slow trickle of users towards Signal, at least in Europe. I was happily surprised when the owners of a house we viewed defaul
by CalRobert 3y ago
It's been slow, but I've noticed a slow trickle of users towards Signal, at least in Europe. I was happily surprised when the owners of a house we viewed defaulted to reaching us via Signal instead of whatsapp.
- Semaphor 3y agoMost people I know are on Signal here (Germany), that includes older relatives. Alas, for group conversations or bad connection situations (e.g. at a festival), everyone uses WA. Not sure why groups are always WA, but Signal (and actually any other messenger) sucks for bad connections.
- sergimansilla 3y agoIn my experience, Telegram excels at speed and bad connection situations.
- Moldoteck 3y agoand at unsecure communication. Their chats aren't e2ee by default, making it worse than Whatsapp. Also, videocalls in telegram are much worse compared to said messenger
- Geezus_42 3y agoI could have sworn WA isn't true e2e. As in it's encrypted over the wire, but the Meta servers decrypt the data during relay.
- losvedir 3y agoNo, WhatsApp is truly e2e encrypted and uses the same Ratchet algorithm in Signal, IIRC. That's why tptacek and moxie were generally positive about it. I think there's something about key rotation and a default setting where it doesn't notify you if the keys change, or something like that, at one point.
- yownie 3y agoIt's most likely e2e up until the moment LEO requests information on a particular user and then Meta updates your app to a trojaned version, that just APPEARS E2E.
- callalex 3y agoIt also heavily encourages you to “back up” your messages to them in an unencrypted manner. It will bug you literally every time you enter the app if you opt out of this “feature”.
- Semaphor 3y agoCan’t confirm, it’s disabled for me, and it has never again asked me to. It also offers the option of encrypting my backups.
- Semaphor 3y agoI guess that could be, I only know one person using it, though, a US American who also uses WA. Everyone else is Signal/WhatsApp, and maybe Threema.
- CalRobert 3y agoFor what it's worth I have a few Signal group chats going. We had our video call to talk to the owners (we're moving to the Netherlands from Ireland) over Signal and it worked well, but that was on a strong wifi connection
- Semaphor 3y agoDidn't mean they don't exist, just that everyone creating groups in my circles uses Whatsapp, even if they otherwise use signal.
- feyes 3y agoFor me it's been telegram. Even my in laws are on it. Cutting old social media never impacted my life much though.
- openweb 3y agoTelegram is getting almost as common as whatsapp for my social circle, including friends, co-workers and family. Most people I interact with are on either platform.
- elforce002 3y agoI moved my parents to telegram and I can't complain.
- Moldoteck 3y agosame for me, but thinking of moving them to signal due to privacy concerns and ads
- zelphirkalt 3y agoThought something similar, but for my personal network of friends and contacts. Sometimes I am pleasantly surprised to learn, that yet another person I know has or is willing to get Signal. We need to build and keep asking people whether they have Signal or would please get it.
- LikesPwsh 3y ago(UK) I got rid of signal when they dropped SMS support. Using an alternative sms app that sometimes upgrades messages to signal was nearly zero friction. Keeping an alternative messaging app for one contact is borderline-charity. I'd do it to help with network effects if I wanted to support the company, but the attempt at crypto integration already cost them my good will.
- fauigerzigerk 3y agoThe crypto integration put me off as well. Not because I'm opposed to crypto currencies in principle, but integrating them into a privacy focused chat app is plain idiotic. Crypto disposals are taxable in the UK and I believe in most other countries as well. So tax authorities have a legitimate reason to look into what's going on there. There is no right to privacy when it comes to buying and selling securities.
- dguest 3y agoEveryone I communicate with uses Signal now. In Europe using Signal costs the same amount as using WhatsApp, if not less because of the missing bloatware (backups etc). In a lot of the world, WhatsApp is free (I assume some kind of payment from Meta to the telecom). There's no way Signal will compete with something that is bundled with every phone contract for whatever reason.
- BLKNSLVR 3y agoIn Australia both Signal and WhatsApp are free, aside from using the data service rather than the "telephone" service, and we pay for a monthly or annual data quota with our phone plan. Do you have separate charges for Signal and/or WhatsApp?
- dguest 3y agoYeah I guess I confused a lot of people: the charges are for the data, not the app. They are tiny, but if you use the app heavily and rely on it, you don't want to be disconnected when your data runs out.
- Ylpertnodi 3y agoYou pay for signal? Which bit of Europe are you being ripped off in?
- 0x20Fearless 3y agoI read this as a phone contract having a bundled: unlimited whatsapp, Spotify, Facebook bundles where data usage is not counted towards your total data allowance in the contract. For example in my country in the middle of Europe you have bundles with unlimited traditional communication and 20 50 80GB of mobile data. When you WhatsApp all day sending videos, gifs, messages, voice messages, pictures, documents..I can consume up to 12GB per month, this costing me an amount of my 20GB data plan. While a other provider I can choose has a 20GB data plan with a unlimited WhatsApp bundle. Sadly they don’t offer eSIM and 5G so it’s a no go for me.
- 3y ago
- benjaminwootton 3y agoI don’t see much adoption of Signal, but Telegram is inching forward in the UK and UAE, in my circles at least.
- Tor3 3y agoMy whole extended family is on Line. It does it all really, and no ads or intrusion. It has only one single drawback - one device only (or one, plus a Windows PC, which is not an option for me).
- heresie-dabord 3y agoThe social-media business is neither trustworthy for me as a consumer nor more fulfilling than a real conversation with a real human somewhere. I don't want a relationship with social media. But I'm not going to be delusional about it, if literally hundreds of millions of people are depending on social-media business for their social happiness, I can see that it works for them. I want a secure, trustworthy, minimally-viable telecommunications channel for some contacts. I support Signal, it has characteristics that I trust, including being open source.[1] I also have shown other people how to enable Google's RCS messaging.[2] It's better than SMS. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_(software) [2] https://support.google.com/messages/answer/13508703 https://support.google.com/messages/answer/13508703
- pjmlp 3y agoAs European, I don't know anyone that uses Signal. Meta Messenger, Skype, Whatsapp, Viber and Telegram? Tons of them.
- jacquesm 3y agoIn Eastern Europe Signal is very popular.
- 76SlashDolphin 3y agoAs someone else in Eastern Europe, 99% of people I know communicate over Messenger, Instagram (if more hip), or Viber (if 40+). I believe that the messaging app situation varies a lot from one city to another or even one "group" to another.
- jacquesm 3y agoInteresting, my contacts are mostly in Romania, Estonia, Latvia and Poland, and mostly IT savvy (as users, not programmers), so the latter could well be a factor.
- ricardobayes 3y agoThat seems to be contained in the German-speaking side of Europe. But even Germany is 50-50 Whatsapp.