2 ms·
should have been "new" seems to have been typoed or autocorrected in error to "be." Meh. Maybe the word with the mistake and possible correction are not as obvi
by harry8 3y ago
should have been "new" seems to have been typoed or autocorrected in error to "be." Meh. Maybe the word with the mistake and possible correction are not as obvious as they appear to their author, hope that helps.
- jahsome 3y agoThank you for the clarification, that makes much more sense. I truly could not make heads or tails, especially after the gore from the article's lead sentence, heh.