> No, it's not fine. Children are important, and worthy of getting new stories that address their needs. Equating retaining ownership by copyright to protectio

> No, it's not fine. Children are important, and worthy of getting new stories that address their needs. Equating retaining ownership by copyright to protection, is an example of reasoning used to abuse copyright. The products still exist when they enter the public domain and need no additional protection, that copyright offers. It's really disturbing to see commenters repeat the attitudes that left copyright in such a degenerate state.