5 ms·

I was expecting to be outraged at Facebook, but reading how the warrant was cleverly phrased, I dont belive they did anything questionable.

andrewfromx 3y ago
and 28 weeks vs 40 weeks makes no difference? Some would debate "a still born baby" implies full term?
- readthenotes1 3y ago
  24 weeks is viable nowadays. 37 is full term So yeah, baby.
isodev 3y ago
Handing over someone’s chats isn’t questionable? Let’s at least try not to normalize surveillance.
- andrewfromx 3y ago
  wow, such good arguments on both sides. I need to re-watch 1984.
traviswt 3y ago
It shouldn't be possible for them to turn over the chats. E2E encryption is tables stakes for messaging, but they won't do it because there's profit to be had in understanding users through their private messages. So yes, Facebook is still in the wrong here.
- gmerc 3y ago
  They do offer an E2E platform Whatsapp which is wildly popular in the rest of the world AND the ability to have e2e encrypted chats on messenger too. So really what more to expect?
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
- smoldesu 3y ago
  How would E2E encryption stop law enforcement from subpoenaing data at-rest?
  - LargeTomato 3y ago
    I think E2E is encrypted at rest. Technically, all data over TLS is encrypted while in transit.
    - smoldesu 3y ago
      E2EE strictly means that it is encrypted between endpoints. It makes no promises about how the keys are handled, how the data is protected at rest, or how secure either endpoint is. TLS is a version of this, but also demonstrates how useless such a version of encryption is if either endpoint is malicious. This is one of the reasons homomorphic encryption is interesting. It should enable this kinda of "total user control" over your data, but it's highly unlikely consumer systems will implement it.
- fsociety 3y ago
  They have been rolling out E2E chats in messenger for a while now. So yes, they will and are doing it.
- friend_and_foe 3y ago
  If it were table stakes people would opt for messeaging applications that have it, seeing that there's a plethora of them out there. I don't like Facebook, and I don't use it or any of Meta's products, but if people want encryption they have options.
- bob-09 3y ago
  [flagged]

andrewfromx 3y ago

and 28 weeks vs 40 weeks makes no difference? Some would debate "a still born baby" implies full term?

readthenotes1 3y ago
24 weeks is viable nowadays. 37 is full term So yeah, baby.

isodev 3y ago

Handing over someone’s chats isn’t questionable? Let’s at least try not to normalize surveillance.

andrewfromx 3y ago
wow, such good arguments on both sides. I need to re-watch 1984.

traviswt 3y ago

It shouldn't be possible for them to turn over the chats. E2E encryption is tables stakes for messaging, but they won't do it because there's profit to be had in understanding users through their private messages. So yes, Facebook is still in the wrong here.

gmerc 3y ago
They do offer an E2E platform Whatsapp which is wildly popular in the rest of the world AND the ability to have e2e encrypted chats on messenger too. So really what more to expect?
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
smoldesu 3y ago
How would E2E encryption stop law enforcement from subpoenaing data at-rest?
- LargeTomato 3y ago
  I think E2E is encrypted at rest. Technically, all data over TLS is encrypted while in transit.
  - smoldesu 3y ago
    E2EE strictly means that it is encrypted between endpoints. It makes no promises about how the keys are handled, how the data is protected at rest, or how secure either endpoint is. TLS is a version of this, but also demonstrates how useless such a version of encryption is if either endpoint is malicious. This is one of the reasons homomorphic encryption is interesting. It should enable this kinda of "total user control" over your data, but it's highly unlikely consumer systems will implement it.
fsociety 3y ago
They have been rolling out E2E chats in messenger for a while now. So yes, they will and are doing it.
friend_and_foe 3y ago
If it were table stakes people would opt for messeaging applications that have it, seeing that there's a plethora of them out there. I don't like Facebook, and I don't use it or any of Meta's products, but if people want encryption they have options.
bob-09 3y ago
[flagged]