4 ms·

Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After Covid-19 Vaccination

• themusicgod1 3y ago
  it's retracted / BS
• dent9876543 3y ago
  There is quite a lot of chatter about this paper in certain groups. Compared to population sizes, numbers still seem minuscule. So the “safe” aspect of “safe and effective” would seem to remain just about appropriate. Yet there also seems to be an increasingly definite and concerning risk profile emerging. Is that a fair summary?
  • themusicgod1 3y ago
    a fair summary would be to say it's retracted because it's BS
  • g42gregory 3y ago
    That's what I am getting as well. Also, they only looked at the autopsies, presumably most of the mortalities are not autopsied. Lancet just removed the article, - it lasted only 24 hours online.
    • dent9876543 3y ago
      Would be good to see a bit more detail on why the conclusions are not supported by the methodology. Is it simply that the conclusions reached a bit far?, or are the Lancet claiming that the paper is factually incorrect?
• SSBhatia 3y ago
  This is still available.. https://zenodo.org/record/8120771/files/AUTOPSY%20REVIEW%20SUPPLEMENTAL%20TABLE%201.pdf https://zenodo.org/record/8120771/files/AUTOPSY%20REVIEW%20S...
• SSBhatia 3y ago
  This is still available https://zenodo.org/record/8120771/files/AUTOPSY%20REVIEW%20SUPPLEMENTAL%20TABLE%201.pdf https://zenodo.org/record/8120771/files/AUTOPSY%20REVIEW%20S...