3 ms·
2019... from the era of "5G causes covid"
by keikobadthebad 3y ago
2019... from the era of "5G causes covid"
- Terr_ 3y agoOn the same site, another author posted a rebuttal 11 days later: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/dont-fall-prey-to-scaremongering-about-5g/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/dont-fall-... > While it’s pragmatic and laudable to constantly monitor for any potential emergent effects, the overwhelming weight of the evidence to date does not support the hypothesis that our current cellular technology is carcinogenic. Even at higher exposures, there is no reputable indication of carcinogenicity. Long-term studies of radar workers do not show a hint of increased cancer incidence, despite the exceptional levels of RFR to which these subjects are exposed. > [...] To put it in context, the weakest visible light is more than 17,000 times more energetic than the highest-energy 5G photon possible. Were they consistent, anti-5G activists should be orders of magnitude more concerned about light bulbs than cellular phones. The fact that they aren’t is indicative of a gross misunderstanding. The reality is that for [radio-frequency radiation], there is no known plausible biophysical mechanism of action for harm, nor does the combined weight of epidemiological data support this conjecture.