4 ms·

You are allowed to discuss workplace conditions. That's like, protected concerted activity 101. If the business was uncomfortable with their treatment of their

You are allowed to discuss workplace conditions. That's like, protected concerted activity 101. If the business was uncomfortable with their treatment of their employees being public, maybe that activity wasn't ethical.

cmdli 3y ago
There's a difference between speaking publicly about workplace conditions and livetweeting the details of an individual conversation in a (likely) mocking tone. At that point, the only thing standing between you and being fired is whatever legal defense you can muster, because no reasonable person is going to want to work with you after that.
- grimgoldgo 3y ago
  What's your source for the mocking tone? Is lizthegrey known for tweeting about hr proceedings in a moving tone? Also, what is tweeting if not "speaking publicly"? And what are workplace conditions if not "how I am disciplined at work"?
  - 1000bestlives 3y ago
    In short, yes. If you're unfortunate enough to be involved in a conversation with that individual, prepare to be insulted
    - rimunroe 3y ago
      I'm in slightly overlapping social circles with Liz and have never felt remotely insulted the times we've chatted. I don't follow her on Twitter anymore and haven't been around her since the pandemic started, but I'd be shocked if she insulted people indiscriminately. For all I know she might insult people when she sees them say things she thinks are shitty, but I haven't experienced that and I think we've disagreed on things in the past.
once_inc 3y ago
Bullshit. Bringing someone from outside a business to a conversation that "slightly livetweets" what is being said is totally not acceptable. I invite you to bring an outside party to your next business meeting, standup or all hands meeting and have them "slightly livetweet" it. You will find the door before the meeting ends. Businesses have every right to some level of obscurity on what happens internally. There is a very clear difference between using a tape recorder or your smartphone to record a conversation (after clearly stating that you will do so!) and having someone without any relation to the company present and blurbing everything into the ether.
- grimgoldgo 3y ago
  Those meetings are not disciplinary meetings where your performance is being discussed. Everything in a disciplinary meeting is workplace conditions, full stop. And if hr disagreed, they could have asked the guest to leave.
  - once_inc 3y ago
    How does it being a disciplinary meeting effect the validity of bringing in an external party that isn't professionally tied to any party and which "slightly livetweets" events to the general public? Were they not livetweeting: fine, you can bring a family member or friend to these meetings. But they were.
Demotolo 3y ago
What? While I have an internal meeting I would NOT assume someone is life tweeting this.
- grimgoldgo 3y ago
  An internal meeting is a much broader category than "a disciplinary meeting to issue a verbal warning from hr".
  - Demotolo 3y ago
    [dead]
irjustin 3y ago
It's the "live-tweeting" aspect. You're not showing a basic level of respect to the nature of the conversation.
- grimgoldgo 3y ago
  She wasn't live tweeting her hr warning, her witness was. (Who was likely not a participant in the conversation).
  - irjustin 3y ago
    To me, that's just as bad. Someone you brought in is doing something disrespectful and indicative of the central problem to the conversation. If you come to my house and draw on my walls - I ask you to stop and let's have a conversation about it, so you bring a friend who starts drawing on my walls while we're talking about you drawing on my walls. You've lost all goodwill that I was willing to extend to you.
    - once_inc 3y ago
      To me, that is even worse.
  - irrational 3y ago
    How is it that you think this makes it better? I’m asking in all seriousness. To my mind, I can’t conceive of ever thinking this way, so I’m trying to understand what your thought process is.
IshKebab 3y ago
You are allowed to do many things that will piss off your employer so they want to find a way to fire you.

cmdli 3y ago

There's a difference between speaking publicly about workplace conditions and livetweeting the details of an individual conversation in a (likely) mocking tone. At that point, the only thing standing between you and being fired is whatever legal defense you can muster, because no reasonable person is going to want to work with you after that.

grimgoldgo 3y ago
What's your source for the mocking tone? Is lizthegrey known for tweeting about hr proceedings in a moving tone? Also, what is tweeting if not "speaking publicly"? And what are workplace conditions if not "how I am disciplined at work"?
- 1000bestlives 3y ago
  In short, yes. If you're unfortunate enough to be involved in a conversation with that individual, prepare to be insulted
  - rimunroe 3y ago
    I'm in slightly overlapping social circles with Liz and have never felt remotely insulted the times we've chatted. I don't follow her on Twitter anymore and haven't been around her since the pandemic started, but I'd be shocked if she insulted people indiscriminately. For all I know she might insult people when she sees them say things she thinks are shitty, but I haven't experienced that and I think we've disagreed on things in the past.

once_inc 3y ago

Bullshit. Bringing someone from outside a business to a conversation that "slightly livetweets" what is being said is totally not acceptable. I invite you to bring an outside party to your next business meeting, standup or all hands meeting and have them "slightly livetweet" it. You will find the door before the meeting ends. Businesses have every right to some level of obscurity on what happens internally. There is a very clear difference between using a tape recorder or your smartphone to record a conversation (after clearly stating that you will do so!) and having someone without any relation to the company present and blurbing everything into the ether.

grimgoldgo 3y ago
Those meetings are not disciplinary meetings where your performance is being discussed. Everything in a disciplinary meeting is workplace conditions, full stop. And if hr disagreed, they could have asked the guest to leave.
- once_inc 3y ago
  How does it being a disciplinary meeting effect the validity of bringing in an external party that isn't professionally tied to any party and which "slightly livetweets" events to the general public? Were they not livetweeting: fine, you can bring a family member or friend to these meetings. But they were.

Demotolo 3y ago

What? While I have an internal meeting I would NOT assume someone is life tweeting this.

grimgoldgo 3y ago
An internal meeting is a much broader category than "a disciplinary meeting to issue a verbal warning from hr".
- Demotolo 3y ago
  [dead]

irjustin 3y ago

It's the "live-tweeting" aspect. You're not showing a basic level of respect to the nature of the conversation.

grimgoldgo 3y ago
She wasn't live tweeting her hr warning, her witness was. (Who was likely not a participant in the conversation).
- irjustin 3y ago
  To me, that's just as bad. Someone you brought in is doing something disrespectful and indicative of the central problem to the conversation. If you come to my house and draw on my walls - I ask you to stop and let's have a conversation about it, so you bring a friend who starts drawing on my walls while we're talking about you drawing on my walls. You've lost all goodwill that I was willing to extend to you.
  - once_inc 3y ago
    To me, that is even worse.
- irrational 3y ago
  How is it that you think this makes it better? I’m asking in all seriousness. To my mind, I can’t conceive of ever thinking this way, so I’m trying to understand what your thought process is.

IshKebab 3y ago

You are allowed to do many things that will piss off your employer so they want to find a way to fire you.