3 ms·
> Bro. When corrupt behaviour is so normalised that you don't even see it as corruption, just 'problematic', that's a sign that your corruption calibrators need
by disgruntledphd2 3y ago
> Bro. When corrupt behaviour is so normalised that you don't even see it as corruption, just 'problematic', that's a sign that your corruption calibrators need a good clean. And they really, really do. That's what I'm trying to tell you, but you seem to disagree even when you agree.
This was entirely needless.
I could have said that you sound like a raving paranoid, and that would have been equally needless. But I didn't (well, almost) because I'm trying to assume good intent.
Lets be 100% clear, you don't know me, you have never (probably) met me and yet you are making assumptions on my integrity that are completely beyond the bloody pale.
I'm going to bow out now, as this conversation is unlikely to improve my (or your, presumably) mood.
Have a nice day!
- mandmandam 3y agoIf I sound like a "raving paranoid" while describing things that actually happened, I think that says more about our regulators than about me. > I'm trying to assume good intent. Only for the DPC. Which is weird tbh, given that you haven't pointed to a single effective uncorrupt regulator that might prove the counterfactual. > you are making assumptions on my integrity that are completely beyond the bloody pale. Not my intention. G'luck!