2 ms·

> But hooooly crap does it underscore how much of a catastrophe Musk’s actions are I think that pretty much nails it. This is Zuckerberg's life - social media

> But hooooly crap does it underscore how much of a catastrophe Musk’s actions are I think that pretty much nails it. This is Zuckerberg's life - social media & nearby segments - and he's still in his prime (very active, attentive to threats / paranoid) as a competitor in the business sphere. If you give him an opening to cripple Twitter opportunistically, he's going to take a shot. Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat (thus he didn't have to be overly concerned with his actions promptly sinking the ship)? It would be hilariously delusional if so.

photonerd 3y ago
> Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat It kind of did, just by network effects, but he’s spent the last 6+ months systematically filling it in. This last weekend might be the walls crumbling down
- data-ottawa 3y ago
  Twitter was great because you could broadcast and get picked up by news orgs and viewed by everyone for years. And it didn’t need a CRM or IT staff to deal with, just someone with a phone. Now that that’s over it can’t meet the needs of services like my local power company pushing updates.
ChatGTP 3y ago
Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat (thus he didn't have to be overly concerned with his actions promptly sinking the ship)? It would be hilariously delusional if so. Of course it had a moat, wow.
abledon 3y ago
> Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat Yes, first mover advantage. I don't think normal non-technically inclined people are going to move their twitter activities to "Threads".
- dragonwriter 3y ago
  > I don't think normal non-technically inclined people are going to move their twitter activities to "Threads". Normal, non-technical users (including the key ones that produce a lot of content that other people come for) are often already on Instagram, and many are moving more of their presence their recently even without a Twitter-like UI in response to changes on Twitter. So, that’s something Meta can leverage to build Threads if they manage it well.
  - abledon 3y ago
    Place your bets here https://manifold.markets/Alice/will-threads-have-more-daily-active https://manifold.markets/Alice/will-threads-have-more-daily-...
dragonwriter 3y ago
> Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat (thus he didn't have to be overly concerned with his actions promptly sinking the ship)? I don’t think he cared [0], because he’s always wanted to gut Twitter and remake it as a a very different service that is not really in the same market (very different substantive functions and revenue model.) On the other hand he seems to have very not-evidence-based and turns-out-to-be-wrong-at-every-step map of how to get from a ad-supported microblogging platform to a user-pays long-form-content-and-financial-services platform. [0] It did, through network effexts, but his plans were incompatible with focussing on preserving it.

photonerd 3y ago

> Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat It kind of did, just by network effects, but he’s spent the last 6+ months systematically filling it in. This last weekend might be the walls crumbling down

data-ottawa 3y ago
Twitter was great because you could broadcast and get picked up by news orgs and viewed by everyone for years. And it didn’t need a CRM or IT staff to deal with, just someone with a phone. Now that that’s over it can’t meet the needs of services like my local power company pushing updates.

ChatGTP 3y ago

Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat (thus he didn't have to be overly concerned with his actions promptly sinking the ship)? It would be hilariously delusional if so. Of course it had a moat, wow.

abledon 3y ago

> Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat Yes, first mover advantage. I don't think normal non-technically inclined people are going to move their twitter activities to "Threads".

dragonwriter 3y ago
> I don't think normal non-technically inclined people are going to move their twitter activities to "Threads". Normal, non-technical users (including the key ones that produce a lot of content that other people come for) are often already on Instagram, and many are moving more of their presence their recently even without a Twitter-like UI in response to changes on Twitter. So, that’s something Meta can leverage to build Threads if they manage it well.
- abledon 3y ago
  Place your bets here https://manifold.markets/Alice/will-threads-have-more-daily-active https://manifold.markets/Alice/will-threads-have-more-daily-...

dragonwriter 3y ago

> Did Musk think Twitter actually had a moat (thus he didn't have to be overly concerned with his actions promptly sinking the ship)? I don’t think he cared [0], because he’s always wanted to gut Twitter and remake it as a a very different service that is not really in the same market (very different substantive functions and revenue model.) On the other hand he seems to have very not-evidence-based and turns-out-to-be-wrong-at-every-step map of how to get from a ad-supported microblogging platform to a user-pays long-form-content-and-financial-services platform. [0] It did, through network effexts, but his plans were incompatible with focussing on preserving it.