3 ms·
You mean like that time where they added lenience for people building FDA compliant medical devices? Oh wait, they didn't. No, they instead told the people wan
by noirscape 3y ago
You mean like that time where they added lenience for people building FDA compliant medical devices?
Oh wait, they didn't. No, they instead told the people wanting to build those devices that they were supporting Tivoization and that the only road to compliance was to change the law.[0]
The FSF has a far greater history of telling other people to shove it than they have been trying to work together with possible members of their community.
[0]: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-fda https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-fda
- ersatzz 3y agoIn that very article the FSF says to comply with both the GPL and "regulatons" companies are free to employ a ROM. Nowhere in that article does it say the regulations must change. Why even bring this article up? The FSF seem pretty reasonable here. Not to mention I couldn't find any evidence on the web of the FDA requiring Tivoization for medical devices.