4 ms·
Ultimately if he had a peer reviewed paper, a patent disclosure could have been filed concurrently. Investors would much prefer to back the team that did X vs t
by lumost 3y ago
Ultimately if he had a peer reviewed paper, a patent disclosure could have been filed concurrently. Investors would much prefer to back the team that did X vs the inevitable folks who think X is easy.
The lack of peer review or replication makes this almost a guaranteed fraud.
- sigmoid10 3y agoWhat makes this a guaranteed fraud is that the guy is literally known in his field for faking data. This shouldn't even be a headline unless someone completely unrelated comes in and confirms it.
- jacquesm 3y agoInvestors are known to throw good money after bad ideas without DD so I guess some will try to see if they get lucky.