4 ms·
org-mode is a brilliant format. The limitation is that you would have to use Emacs or something which support .org files. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLV
by tpreetham 3y ago
org-mode is a brilliant format.
The limitation is that you would have to use Emacs or something which support .org files.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVtKhBrRV_ZkPnBtt_TD1Cs9PJlU0IIdE https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVtKhBrRV_ZkPnBtt_TD1Cs9P...
- still_grokking 3y agoWhat else besides EMACS supports .org files? Form the alternatives I've seen so far it looks best. But EMACS? (I'm on Linux, but never liked EMACS or Vi(m)). The second best looking alternative seems AsciiDoc. It has some more tooling as I see it. But really like the .org syntax best so far. So any recommendations for tooling?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- BenFeldman1930 3y agoAsciiDoc still has no footnotes, but only endnotes. Therefore not really useful for writing non-fiction books. As org-mode files are only text files, you can use any editor you like. If you want all the goodies (agenda, TODOs etc), you have to use Emacs, yes.
- still_grokking 3y ago> AsciiDoc still has no footnotes, but only endnotes. Does Markdown have footnotes or endnotes? No? People are still misusing it for everything! Especially for technical writing, which is just nuts.