Not my claim. Why would you say it was? Strange. I'm looking for data as evidence of the claim made by google that paying them is worthwhile which I don't see

Not my claim. Why would you say it was? Strange. I'm looking for data as evidence of the claim made by google that paying them is worthwhile which I don't see much of. So yeah you can update your prior with "people pay for it so it must be good" It has some weight. I mentioned something pretty similar right up top when I went through the anecdotal evidence we have. People paid for lobotomy and gave this guy: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1949/moniz/facts/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1949/moniz/facts/ a nobel prize for it where he announced there were never any negative side-effects or outcomes(!). To as room full of serious and successful scientists. Meh. Group think really does happen. We find out if it has when there is direct evidence, which we don't yet have here, which continues to be a shame. When it comes up I'm always hopeful someone will say "Yes we do!" and link some good data.