4 ms·

Your client data? No never asked for it. Any data, from anywhere relating to this, ie showing google ads success. Google publishing success stories maybe? Anyt

by harry8 3y ago

Your client data? No never asked for it. Any data, from anywhere relating to this, ie showing google ads success. Google publishing success stories maybe? Anything. Conversation works better if you don't claim people said things they didn't say. I guess we're going the second route? Seems a shame. But sure for disruption we have Tesla - brand strength to rival Mercedes. Ad spend $0. We have Trump, became president. I strongly doubt google ads were the key part of his presidency push. Both of those marketing campaigns were pretty disruptive. Never seen a google internet ad for the google pixel. Seen plenty of tv ads. That seems like an interesting data point? Lots of tv ads for chrome in my sport among the gambling ads too.

justapassenger 3y ago
Data showing Google's ads success? It's out there - check SEC fillings for Google's advertising revenue. Meanwhile I'm still waiting for you to respond to my original request of source of your bold claim: > For most businesses today, Google ads are not cost-effective.
- harry8 3y ago
  Not my claim. Why would you say it was? Strange. I'm looking for data as evidence of the claim made by google that paying them is worthwhile which I don't see much of. So yeah you can update your prior with "people pay for it so it must be good" It has some weight. I mentioned something pretty similar right up top when I went through the anecdotal evidence we have. People paid for lobotomy and gave this guy: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1949/moniz/facts/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1949/moniz/facts/ a nobel prize for it where he announced there were never any negative side-effects or outcomes(!). To as room full of serious and successful scientists. Meh. Group think really does happen. We find out if it has when there is direct evidence, which we don't yet have here, which continues to be a shame. When it comes up I'm always hopeful someone will say "Yes we do!" and link some good data.

by harry8 3y ago

justapassenger 3y ago

Data showing Google's ads success? It's out there - check SEC fillings for Google's advertising revenue. Meanwhile I'm still waiting for you to respond to my original request of source of your bold claim: > For most businesses today, Google ads are not cost-effective.

harry8 3y ago
Not my claim. Why would you say it was? Strange. I'm looking for data as evidence of the claim made by google that paying them is worthwhile which I don't see much of. So yeah you can update your prior with "people pay for it so it must be good" It has some weight. I mentioned something pretty similar right up top when I went through the anecdotal evidence we have. People paid for lobotomy and gave this guy: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1949/moniz/facts/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1949/moniz/facts/ a nobel prize for it where he announced there were never any negative side-effects or outcomes(!). To as room full of serious and successful scientists. Meh. Group think really does happen. We find out if it has when there is direct evidence, which we don't yet have here, which continues to be a shame. When it comes up I'm always hopeful someone will say "Yes we do!" and link some good data.