4 ms·
How about a counter strategy? - randomize the url list - ask for evidence of copyright violation of a specific url number - if human does not answer, claim t
by cookiengineer 3y ago
How about a counter strategy?
- randomize the url list
- ask for evidence of copyright violation of a specific url number
- if human does not answer, claim they acted in bad faith
- give them 14 days to respond
Win/win. Gotta game the system, and increase the cost/effectiveness ratio.
- realusername 3y agoMaybe we should create a fund to sue those illegal DMCA requests back
- chii 3y agoI don't know if it's true, but in another comment thread, it was mentioned that if you truly are the owner of the copyright, filing a DMCA takedown against someone who didn't actually have a violation is not perjury and thus have no real consequences (cept perhaps to say 'sorry bro'). So it's apparently not going to be effective to counterclaim as it cost you more to do this than they lose.
- cookiengineer 3y ago> it cost you more to do this than they lose. My proposed responder can be easily automated. It might cost them no money in court, but it costs them human salaries - and that's the point. We have to make DMCA takedowns an unfeasible business model to change the status quo of bad actors.