2 ms·

IPFS isn't the right use case for a dropbox clone. It behaves like a CDN with no persistence guarantees. Arweave is better suited to archival storage. There ar

IPFS isn't the right use case for a dropbox clone. It behaves like a CDN with no persistence guarantees. Arweave is better suited to archival storage. There are options for participants to ban particular types of content which may be illegal to host in their jurisdiction. This was designed to prevent the spread of CP, terrorism related info, etc. but that means it is also susceptible to DCMA issues too. https://www.arweave.org/ https://www.arweave.org/

brunoqc 3y ago
> IPFS isn't the right use case for a dropbox clone. It behaves like a CDN with no persistence guarantees. Peergos kinda do it but maybe it's only for the transport and it uses S3 or something like that. > Arweave is better suited to archival storage Thanks, I'll take a look. I wish there was more exciting ipfs news beside nfts. EDIT: Arweave seems to be part of the crypto/web3 thing I'm not a fan of.
- imtringued 3y ago
  Arweave promises a perpetual motion machine. Prepaying for storage is good but there is no way it is permanent.