4 ms·
Yes, I'm making a reference to the time when these massive residential building projects began as a juxtaposition for today. The costs of just becoming a renter
by RyanAdamas 3y ago
Yes, I'm making a reference to the time when these massive residential building projects began as a juxtaposition for today. The costs of just becoming a renter today are similar to what it took to own a home previously. Zoning is not irrelevant it is the absolute cause of these areas essentially becoming Special Economic Zones which are now, in historic fashion, about to flounder and fade unless the powers that be command workers back to the office, back to the commute, back to the grind.
So? LA is a desert and requires the rest of the region to support their needs; which is really just their real estate values through sustained population growth - which would otherwise not happen without sucking H2O from everywhere else. Knock down the buildings and repurpose the materials for other areas then; though people will claim that's not "profitable" either so it will just be melted, crushed and buried instead of repurposed.
Converting buildings creates jobs! Isn't that the point of much of this, job creation so we can keep all these devious little beings busy? Jobs means they can afford the new constructs. Even at increased costs, how many of these buildings are paid off? How many change hands as a means of transferring debt, buying out equity and essentially playing a Fastowian shell game? The idea that, "we can't profit off that" is absurd given how much the governments of this country subsidize profitability for the people who are wrecking so much.
- nocoiner 3y agoLOL, was that an Andy Fastow reference? Deep cut, I love it, even if I’m still not sure how it applies here.
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoLA really isn’t a desert. It is definitely near a desert, but the city itself isn’t very desert like. LA’s water use is a lot smaller than the farms around LA, so converting farms to residential use would actually save a lot of water.
- salawat 3y ago>so converting farms to residential use would actually save a lot of water. Pray tell, where would you source the food required to support said new residents if you're going to convert farm land already dedicated to supporting people who are already there? Not sure about California's import/export situation with Ag output.
- seanmcdirmid 3y agoLA at least gets a lot of its food from Mexico. Most of the farms in that region are for specialty crops that get exported anyways. Like almonds. I like almonds, but most people don’t live on them. But the point isn’t to get rid of the farms, just that LAs water usage as a city is tiny in comparison to California’s agricultural water usage in general.