4 ms·
Submarines are not glued tight, yet they are waterproof. Much bigger deal for Apple is design. Exposed screws sealing the back cover would give Jony Ive OCD ti
by vletal 3y ago
Submarines are not glued tight, yet they are waterproof.
Much bigger deal for Apple is design. Exposed screws sealing the back cover would give Jony Ive OCD ticks, I'm sure
- nonethewiser 3y agoSubmarines are also waaaaaay more expensive. Largely due to all the engineering and quality control that goes into what you’re talking about.
- mastax 3y agoThankfully, Jony Ive is gone. Though their design has only gotten marginally more practical since.
- algas 3y agoEvery part of your first sentence is inaccurate. Submarines are glued tight; all the body panels are welded together. They do this because making waterproof riveted joints is hard [0]. Riveted joints would flex and open up, requiring constant maintenance and caulking, and early riveted subs would leak trails of fuel behind them (and significantly into the sub itself!) Second, submarines aren't even waterproof. There's lots of things that are hard to seal, like the spinning propeller shaft. Submarines have a natural advantage over your phone in this regard: all the water that leaks in can be pumped out. Under the new regulations, phones can't be glued or welded shut, and there's not much room for a bilge pump in the average modern smartphone. [0]: https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=1518898 https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=1518898
- stjohnswarts 3y agoNone of that really matters since we have the technology to seal phones now, Apple just chooses not to because it makes engineering, manufacturing, and designed in obsolescence a bit easier for them.