3 ms·
And as written, someone that didn't already know about it would make a false inference about what kind of people would be marked as radioactive. I was pre-empti
by SilasX 3y ago
And as written, someone that didn't already know about it would make a false inference about what kind of people would be marked as radioactive. I was pre-empting that (very likely) false inference. The fact that you didn't explicitly say the false thing (or that you can cleverly read "based on debts" to mean some non-obvious thing) doesn't obviate the need for that clarification.
- Dylan16807 3y ago"Clarifications" shouldn't start with the word "No". It might be non-obvious but the phrasing wasn't deceptive or "clever", it's the system that's weird.