4 ms·
Yes, he can even use the free RHEL Dev licenses, he just doesnt want to bother with any kind of licensing system.
by jacooper 3y ago
Yes, he can even use the free RHEL Dev licenses, he just doesnt want to bother with any kind of licensing system.
- rednerrus 3y agoIsn't he trying to make a stand against the silliness that Red Hat is doing?
- tssva 3y agoHe is but should be more honest about it instead of claiming that the reason is not being able to test.
- solarkraft 3y agoNot being able to test conveniently is enough of a reason. The guy did free work for their platform.
- tssva 3y agoIt can still be conveniently tested. He is making a statement and should be more clear that is what is happening here. He didn't do free work for their platform. He did work using their platform which he made freely available to further his own situation. I don't say that in a judgemental way. There is nothing wrong with that, but let's not misrepresent it.
- monkey26 3y agoI do the RedHat side of support for our open source project. And when I do have to spin up real RedHat for something, it’s always a pain of fixing up some licensing or another.
- ilc 3y agoIf it is any comfort, while I was at Red Hat... I used CentOS for testing, for this exact reason. Alas, this was before Red Hat bought CentOS :(.
- yrro 3y agoTo be fair dealing with subscription-manager is agony