4 ms·

I haven't watched the video and was very happy to have a summary. What makes you question it was written by an AI?

by elaus 3y ago

chii 3y ago
and also, if the summary was good, why would it matter whether it was written by an AI or not?
- andsoitis 3y ago
  In your view, is the summary accurate and complete?
- izacus 3y ago
  Because it's poorly written, poorly readable and misses things. It's essentially bot spam with a human clicking the submit button.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
viknesh 3y ago
I thought it was helpful too, but read like it was written by AI. So I wanted to know if it was. What's wrong with asking a question?
- rootlocus 3y ago
  Sarcasm is hard to detect in written form.
  - tough 3y ago
    Not that hard /s
hereonout2 3y ago
It's pretty good, but misses out that it's a Louis Rossmann video, who is a big spokesman for consumer rights against tech companies (also a very popular vlogger and highly skilled electronics tutor). I feel like an AI would be less likely to pick up on this wider context, but possibly the OP just didn't realise who it was.
mnd999 3y ago
It’s pretty obvious.
- mnd999 3y ago
  For the downvoters, if you can’t tell this is an AI you’re gonna be in real trouble if these models actually get good.
jgil 3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35285162 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35285162
apetresc 3y ago
The giveaway for me was the sentence "While not excusing Amazon's actions, he questions whether enough vetting was done before canceling his account." It makes no sense - why would questioning whether enough vetting was done be interpretable by anyone as "excusing Amazon's actions"? It obviously goes in the other direction; the sentence might have read "While not directly condemning Amazon's actions, he questions whether enough vetting was done before canceling his account."

4 ms·

I haven't watched the video and was very happy to have a summary. What makes you question it was written by an AI?

by elaus 3y ago

I haven't watched the video and was very happy to have a summary. What makes you question it was written by an AI?

chii 3y ago
and also, if the summary was good, why would it matter whether it was written by an AI or not?
- andsoitis 3y ago
  In your view, is the summary accurate and complete?
- izacus 3y ago
  Because it's poorly written, poorly readable and misses things. It's essentially bot spam with a human clicking the submit button.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
viknesh 3y ago
I thought it was helpful too, but read like it was written by AI. So I wanted to know if it was. What's wrong with asking a question?
- rootlocus 3y ago
  Sarcasm is hard to detect in written form.
  - tough 3y ago
    Not that hard /s
hereonout2 3y ago
It's pretty good, but misses out that it's a Louis Rossmann video, who is a big spokesman for consumer rights against tech companies (also a very popular vlogger and highly skilled electronics tutor). I feel like an AI would be less likely to pick up on this wider context, but possibly the OP just didn't realise who it was.
mnd999 3y ago
It’s pretty obvious.
- mnd999 3y ago
  For the downvoters, if you can’t tell this is an AI you’re gonna be in real trouble if these models actually get good.
jgil 3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35285162 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35285162
apetresc 3y ago
The giveaway for me was the sentence "While not excusing Amazon's actions, he questions whether enough vetting was done before canceling his account." It makes no sense - why would questioning whether enough vetting was done be interpretable by anyone as "excusing Amazon's actions"? It obviously goes in the other direction; the sentence might have read "While not directly condemning Amazon's actions, he questions whether enough vetting was done before canceling his account."