I don't really get the hostility in your response. Yes, one-time pads are not a practical solution for most use cases, but I never claimed they would be. I was

I don't really get the hostility in your response. Yes, one-time pads are not a practical solution for most use cases, but I never claimed they would be. I was just making a point about their "theoretically unbreakable" property, which I thought is interesting in this context.