5 ms·
Id argue this isn’t true until your spend surpasses $100MM. Lower amounts don’t justify the extra headache of on-prem.
by notyourwork 3y ago
Id argue this isn’t true until your spend surpasses $100MM. Lower amounts don’t justify the extra headache of on-prem.
- pc86 3y agoI know we're just arguing about amounts at this point but that's pushing $2M a week. It seems on on-prem would make financial sense long before that.
- shawabawa3 3y agoDepends on your requirements. If you need 11 nines durability S3 is probably still cheaper
- littlestymaar 3y agoI really hope that Canva's executive dont believe their product need such garantees…
- yencabulator 3y agoThere's also the hybrids. Only storing "unlikely to be accessed" data on S3 would likely remove a huge part of the AWS bill, while significantly limiting the size of the on-prem data set. Of all the possible related problems, object storage is the easiest.