3 ms·
Many aws services are hit or miss but s3 is just a marvel. Running geo-distributed 100s PB Ceph cluster with tiered storage isn't exactly trivial.
by zokier 3y ago
Many aws services are hit or miss but s3 is just a marvel. Running geo-distributed 100s PB Ceph cluster with tiered storage isn't exactly trivial.
- littlestymaar 3y agoMillions of dollars per year isn't exactly a trivial amount of money either… Nobody said it's some super easy thing one could do on their free time, but given the scale it makes sense to build the knowledge in-house instead of getting vendor-locked-in at the most expensive service provider on the market.
- notyourwork 3y agoId argue this isn’t true until your spend surpasses $100MM. Lower amounts don’t justify the extra headache of on-prem.
- pc86 3y agoI know we're just arguing about amounts at this point but that's pushing $2M a week. It seems on on-prem would make financial sense long before that.
- shawabawa3 3y agoDepends on your requirements. If you need 11 nines durability S3 is probably still cheaper
- littlestymaar 3y agoI really hope that Canva's executive dont believe their product need such garantees…
- yencabulator 3y agoThere's also the hybrids. Only storing "unlikely to be accessed" data on S3 would likely remove a huge part of the AWS bill, while significantly limiting the size of the on-prem data set. Of all the possible related problems, object storage is the easiest.