4 ms·
It is the worse of both worlds, because the company ends up paying for an expensive but unused office. Meanwhile, employees who strive in in-person collaborati
by whiplash451 3y ago
It is the worse of both worlds, because the company ends up paying for an expensive but unused office.
Meanwhile, employees who strive in in-person collaboration suffer in their development.
- luma 3y agoWhy would a company furnish an office space for employees who have elected to WFH? The flip side of that argument is that WFH employees should be getting a bonus for all the extra money a company has to spend to babysit the in-office employees. In terms of the collaboration, you are implying that I need to be in the office in order for you to be able to progress as a human. I’d once again wonder why you see this as a problem created by the WFH employee and not the in-office employee who needs personal emotional support from others in order to get the job done.