2 ms·
I gotta say I don't see the point of the two compute requirements - the measure energy and reduce energy consumption part seems like it would be something a com
by bryanrasmussen 3y ago
I gotta say I don't see the point of the two compute requirements - the measure energy and reduce energy consumption part seems like it would be something a company would want to do by itself as that is a cost.
and I'm not sure what disclosing the training time and power used to train the model tells anyone?
on edit: tells anyone that is a consumer of the product and might have legitimate worries which would be a good prompt to legislation, added edit in for eager HN downvoter who didn't like my asking the question.
- pbmonster 3y agoI think they just learned something from the history of crypto currencies, and this time they want hard data from the beginning. I know it's really apples to oranges, but having this 10 years ago for crypto might have pushed the tech from proof-of-work to e.g. proof-of-stake from the beginning. And in the end there's no limits in this act. It's not like they're saying "No models above 10 GWh inside the EU!".
- nonethewiser 3y agoWhy should there be models above 10GWh inside the EU?