I'm not "admitting" anything nobody claimed. >The claim that the funding doesn't come from a "billionaire owned outlet" doesn't really track if you look at the

I'm not "admitting" anything nobody claimed. >The claim that the funding doesn't come from a "billionaire owned outlet" doesn't really track if you look at the investors[0] in Substack. That's your claim to which I objected. It is nonsense. Your linked article above is ridiculous and has /nothing/ whatever to do with that claim. Don't admit it, just acknowledge you got it totally wrong. Easy.