4 ms·

I discounted the article, especially the below part because anyone can say they're "100%" certain about something while they're not. > When a source was asked

I discounted the article, especially the below part because anyone can say they're "100%" certain about something while they're not. > When a source was asked how certain they were that these were the identities of the three WIV scientists who developed symptoms consistent with COVID-19 in the fall of 2019, we were told, “100%” ... That's until I saw that Act on Congress' website. It'll be interesting to see what information is declassified. If there's proof that the mentioned scientists were first to fall ill, I wonder what the consequences are.

throwaway4good 3y ago
Maybe it will be used as an excuse to cancel the forth-coming Blinken visit to China: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/14/politics/blinken-china-announcement/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/14/politics/blinken-china-an... Blinken to travel to China this weekend as US looks to reset relations after spy balloon incident
- unsupp0rted 3y ago
  That would look bad diplomatically. It’s one thing to make up an excuse before going. It’s another thing to cancel in the middle and leave. Not sure what would be accomplished by this.