4 ms·
in my experience, a pure reputation destruction post is generally non-credible, and you posted an establishment media interview on someone who supports twitter:
by stainablesteel 3y ago
in my experience, a pure reputation destruction post is generally non-credible, and you posted an establishment media interview on someone who supports twitter: of course they have a bone to pick.
for the sake of honest conversation, can you list what conspiracy theories you're referring to? because the last few conspiracy theories i can remember somehow all turned out to be true. so i'm really concerned with what is truthful here, i hope you can help.
edit: i'm even more genuinely interested now because i was initially rapidly downvoted, but all i'm seeing in that interview is the tv host interrupting matt every time he tries to answer a question, this is so weird to me.
- donohoe 3y agoNot really. You can easily find this information. Perhaps start here? https://thebanter.substack.com/p/matt-taibbis-puff-piece-on-tucker https://thebanter.substack.com/p/matt-taibbis-puff-piece-on-...
- stainablesteel 3y ago> there is a chance that the NSA did intercept Carlson’s attempts to secure an interview with Vladimir Putin they did, this isn't insane to believe either, they did this to jeff bezos too. US intelligence excels at signal intelligence, this isn't a conspiracy. it then goes on to make even less sense: > Tucker Carlson has never been an intelligence target of the Agency duh, but obviously putin is, why are they deflecting? this is low quality reasoning that fails to address any meat of the arguments. plus, what does any of this have to do with matt? and covid? its like every time i ask a question there's more and more deflections away from the original topic. its so strange.
- gojomo 3y agoMehdi Hasan is proof that MSNBC can air someone who's as much of a shouty partisanship-addled blowhard as Fox's Sean Hannity. Investigative journalist Lee Fang goes deeper into Hasan's allegations about Taibbi – plus Hasan's history of plagiarism & viewpoint-flexible controversialism-for-pay at: https://www.leefang.com/p/mehdi-hasan-plagiarized-pro-spanking https://www.leefang.com/p/mehdi-hasan-plagiarized-pro-spanki...
- athesyn 3y agoAnyone who has seen the interview knows Mehdi wiped the floor with Taibbi and pointed out humiliating mistakes in his reporting -- even Taibbi accepted that. As for the plagiarism, the article in question is from over 20 years ago, hardly a slam dunk nor is it a representative of his journalistic career. The only reason Fang wrote that is because Mehdi accused him of Islamophobia, it's just petty and desperate nonsense.
- gojomo 3y agoSo, Hasan was a plagiarist as he fluffed powers-that-be for partisan credibility – including an example Fang cites from Hasan's 2012 book). The other Fang allegations – including that Hasan now condemns & slurs people for the same sorts of socially-conservative views Hasan once espoused (& maybe still holds in his heart?) also seem well-sourced. Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity have also "wiped the floor" against remote guests, on their shouty home-field cable TV shows. It's a medium for idiocy: slick & shameless verbal bullies win there, and anyone who adopts their news/views from such interactions remains stuck in a partisanship-addled haze.
- jesusofnazarath 3y ago[dead]
- torpid 3y agoI did watch it. Mehdi Hassan found two errors in the entire body of work: One acronym (Taibbi wrote CIS when it was supposed to be CISA), and one date that he got wrong. Then he hammered Taibbi for an hour on those two errors, as if he were a career fraudster, instead of a lion of journalism. Mehdi Hasan is a fraud, an establishment actor on a failing corporate propaganda news network no one takes seriously. A tool of his billionaire owners and of the Biden neocons. Petty and desperate nonsense indeed.