3 ms·
I don't see what one has to do with the other. The issue isn't that you or I agree or disagree. The issue is that no one has offered a workable solution to the
by freejazz 3y ago
I don't see what one has to do with the other. The issue isn't that you or I agree or disagree. The issue is that no one has offered a workable solution to the problem, yet people here insist that its some sort of trivial thing. You refuse to acknowledge that and just keep asking me about enfish... why would I agree to play your game? You can't even honestly discourse with me
- AlbertCory 3y agoIt IS simple; it's just not easy. I've been around negotiators, and you always want to make the other party commit themselves without offering anything yourself. So: would you keep any software patents if it were up to you, or would you not? If you don't want to talk about Enfish, then pick some others.
- freejazz 3y agoI think I finally understand what's going on. You don't have a way of keeping out bad software patents while allowing good ones in. You just don't want any software patents at all, and that's your solution. I think this conversation is probably over.
- AlbertCory 3y agoAs I said at the beginning, "Congress must legislate that software is not patentable subject matter." I'm glad you finally understand that.