7 ms·

It's insulting in the sense that the stoicism of many men is considered unintelligent, primitive, underdeveloped. You can frame it how you want. It can also be

It's insulting in the sense that the stoicism of many men is considered unintelligent, primitive, underdeveloped. You can frame it how you want. It can also be projected as a strength (emotional control). Or men simply being less interested in exchanging emotions intensely as it's just not that important to them.

KptMarchewa 3y ago
The "emotional control" that causes them to absolutely blow the fuck up? It's not unintelligent, primitive or underdeveloped, it's simply a meme, an idea that some people can even sincerely believe but at the end it's a pure lie.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago
  > blow the fuck up I would consider the possibility of BPD. This is kind of a hallmark symptom. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderline_personality_disorder https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderline_personality_disor... Point being: I’ve known men who are “stoic” in this way and emotionally stable because they don’t otherwise have mental health issues.
- jdietrich 3y ago
  Men experience significantly lower rates of most common mental disorders; that gap is wider in younger people, appears to be widening over time and persists after controlling for confounding variables. Men are more likely to die by suicide, but they're drastically less likely to attempt suicide; the discrepancy is accounted for by men choosing more lethal means. There is simply no evidence to support the idea that women are better at coping with psychological distress, or that men would benefit from adopting stereotypically female coping strategies.
  - KptMarchewa 3y ago
    >Men experience significantly lower rates of most common mental disorders; Men are diagnosed significantly lower, not experience.
    - disgruntledphd2 3y ago
      Well we don't really know, as we have no blind test for this. Science on humans is hard.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
- friend_and_foe 3y ago
  I've known men that blow up in extremely stressful circumstances, like slapping things off the table or the stereotypical punching a hole in the wall, for me it is a sign of emotional immaturity. When you're 20 if you do it you've still got some growing up to do, when you're 30 and you do it honestly I judge you. And I know some circumstances can be extremely taxing emotionally, and in very extreme circumstances I can understand losing composure a little, but generally speaking a man should maintain his composure and only react aggressively to actual aggression.
  - ragequittah 3y ago
    As someone who would've never done this age 10-40, experienced extremely severe trauma at age 40, then started having uncontrollable rage fits age 40-43 (it's mostly subsided now, but I still do get more irritated than I used to) I wouldn't be so quick to judge. I thought the same as you before something happened, but it turns out PTSD is a hellofa drug. It's not something you're able control. I didn't learn my way out of it through maturity, I grinded my way through it losing friends along the way. I have no idea what caused me to stop either, other than just distance from the trauma.
- dahwolf 3y ago
  That would be the opposite of emotional control. But surely you got the point that besides suppressing emotions men also tend to simply have less emotional needs or desires to express them. To bring this down to a real world meme-like example: my girlfriend can fill a solid hour every day discussing her work day and in particular developments in her dealings with colleagues. I struggle to fill a minute. I'm not suppressing anything, there's simply not much there as it comes to work. These are just differences, nothing wrong with it.
itishappy 3y ago
Emotional intelligence and emotional control are different. They're separate concepts, though I'd bet they correlate a bit. It's possible to be emotional and out of touch. It's possible to be stoic and receptive.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago
  It doesn’t sound like this is contrary to the idea that it’s insulting when men are considered to lack emotional intelligence because they are stoic. Indeed, it’s possible to be stoic and receptive and it’s insulting when people act like it’s not.
- OrvalWintermute 3y ago
  My cute toddler mini-me has a high amount of emotional intelligence and intuitively understands other people's emotions, and will reflect other people's emotions. She also has no emotional control and is likely to bite you, or bawl on the floor crying when she doesn't get her way.
  - igetspam 3y ago
    She sounds adorable! Mine doesn't bite any more but there are still fits of uncontrollable emotion. They very much grok other people's feelings though and are quick with empathy.
antisthenes 3y ago
> It's insulting in the sense that the stoicism of many men is considered unintelligent, primitive, underdeveloped. I've heard a lot about men needing to be more expressive and open about their inner emotional state, but I've never heard people mention stoicism in the same context or that stoicism necessarily leads to the opposite of that. Or that stoicism is associated with being unintelligent, primitive or underdeveloped. Have you heard it from your circle in a social setting? I'm curious where you heard such sentiments.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago
  > never heard people mention stoicism in the same context I’m not particularly familiar but I understand this “stoicism” is not really the Stoicism one might read about on wikipedia (maybe related but ultimately not congruent). In a practical sense, when people say “more expressive and open” they are necessarily talking about the opposite of this “stoicism”. This “more expressive and open” is also often expressed as “more emotionally intelligent” and that’s insulting to the emotional intelligence of such “stoics”. It’s very literally “they don’t express themselves correctly” and I can’t imagine someone not being insulted by such a claim of their personality.
  - abracadaniel 3y ago
    Emotional intelligence is about understanding what you are feeling and why, not about how you present your emotional state. It’s what allows someone to realize they’re getting angry because they had unspoken expectations that weren’t met, or because they were experiencing anxiety from unrelated triggers. This kind of understanding prevents someone from blowing up in the first place because they understand the root cause isn’t what our brain wants to jump on in the moment. A more “stoic” person may be that way because they are highly emotionally intelligent and avoid getting overwhelmed. Or, they may be bad at it, and are just bottling it up to explode randomly at inappropriate times. It’s related, but tangential.
- dahwolf 3y ago
  I'm not a native speaker so it could be the wrong word. I wasn't aiming for Stoicism, the philosophy. Instead trying to describe the effect where some men seem emotionally indifferent, or present themselves as such.

KptMarchewa 3y ago

The "emotional control" that causes them to absolutely blow the fuck up? It's not unintelligent, primitive or underdeveloped, it's simply a meme, an idea that some people can even sincerely believe but at the end it's a pure lie.

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago
> blow the fuck up I would consider the possibility of BPD. This is kind of a hallmark symptom. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderline_personality_disorder https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderline_personality_disor... Point being: I’ve known men who are “stoic” in this way and emotionally stable because they don’t otherwise have mental health issues.
jdietrich 3y ago
Men experience significantly lower rates of most common mental disorders; that gap is wider in younger people, appears to be widening over time and persists after controlling for confounding variables. Men are more likely to die by suicide, but they're drastically less likely to attempt suicide; the discrepancy is accounted for by men choosing more lethal means. There is simply no evidence to support the idea that women are better at coping with psychological distress, or that men would benefit from adopting stereotypically female coping strategies.
- KptMarchewa 3y ago
  >Men experience significantly lower rates of most common mental disorders; Men are diagnosed significantly lower, not experience.
  - disgruntledphd2 3y ago
    Well we don't really know, as we have no blind test for this. Science on humans is hard.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
friend_and_foe 3y ago
I've known men that blow up in extremely stressful circumstances, like slapping things off the table or the stereotypical punching a hole in the wall, for me it is a sign of emotional immaturity. When you're 20 if you do it you've still got some growing up to do, when you're 30 and you do it honestly I judge you. And I know some circumstances can be extremely taxing emotionally, and in very extreme circumstances I can understand losing composure a little, but generally speaking a man should maintain his composure and only react aggressively to actual aggression.
- ragequittah 3y ago
  As someone who would've never done this age 10-40, experienced extremely severe trauma at age 40, then started having uncontrollable rage fits age 40-43 (it's mostly subsided now, but I still do get more irritated than I used to) I wouldn't be so quick to judge. I thought the same as you before something happened, but it turns out PTSD is a hellofa drug. It's not something you're able control. I didn't learn my way out of it through maturity, I grinded my way through it losing friends along the way. I have no idea what caused me to stop either, other than just distance from the trauma.
dahwolf 3y ago
That would be the opposite of emotional control. But surely you got the point that besides suppressing emotions men also tend to simply have less emotional needs or desires to express them. To bring this down to a real world meme-like example: my girlfriend can fill a solid hour every day discussing her work day and in particular developments in her dealings with colleagues. I struggle to fill a minute. I'm not suppressing anything, there's simply not much there as it comes to work. These are just differences, nothing wrong with it.

itishappy 3y ago

Emotional intelligence and emotional control are different. They're separate concepts, though I'd bet they correlate a bit. It's possible to be emotional and out of touch. It's possible to be stoic and receptive.

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago
It doesn’t sound like this is contrary to the idea that it’s insulting when men are considered to lack emotional intelligence because they are stoic. Indeed, it’s possible to be stoic and receptive and it’s insulting when people act like it’s not.
OrvalWintermute 3y ago
My cute toddler mini-me has a high amount of emotional intelligence and intuitively understands other people's emotions, and will reflect other people's emotions. She also has no emotional control and is likely to bite you, or bawl on the floor crying when she doesn't get her way.
- igetspam 3y ago
  She sounds adorable! Mine doesn't bite any more but there are still fits of uncontrollable emotion. They very much grok other people's feelings though and are quick with empathy.

antisthenes 3y ago

> It's insulting in the sense that the stoicism of many men is considered unintelligent, primitive, underdeveloped. I've heard a lot about men needing to be more expressive and open about their inner emotional state, but I've never heard people mention stoicism in the same context or that stoicism necessarily leads to the opposite of that. Or that stoicism is associated with being unintelligent, primitive or underdeveloped. Have you heard it from your circle in a social setting? I'm curious where you heard such sentiments.

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago
> never heard people mention stoicism in the same context I’m not particularly familiar but I understand this “stoicism” is not really the Stoicism one might read about on wikipedia (maybe related but ultimately not congruent). In a practical sense, when people say “more expressive and open” they are necessarily talking about the opposite of this “stoicism”. This “more expressive and open” is also often expressed as “more emotionally intelligent” and that’s insulting to the emotional intelligence of such “stoics”. It’s very literally “they don’t express themselves correctly” and I can’t imagine someone not being insulted by such a claim of their personality.
- abracadaniel 3y ago
  Emotional intelligence is about understanding what you are feeling and why, not about how you present your emotional state. It’s what allows someone to realize they’re getting angry because they had unspoken expectations that weren’t met, or because they were experiencing anxiety from unrelated triggers. This kind of understanding prevents someone from blowing up in the first place because they understand the root cause isn’t what our brain wants to jump on in the moment. A more “stoic” person may be that way because they are highly emotionally intelligent and avoid getting overwhelmed. Or, they may be bad at it, and are just bottling it up to explode randomly at inappropriate times. It’s related, but tangential.
dahwolf 3y ago
I'm not a native speaker so it could be the wrong word. I wasn't aiming for Stoicism, the philosophy. Instead trying to describe the effect where some men seem emotionally indifferent, or present themselves as such.