> and yet, Apple charges for it as if it was a real workstation equipment rather than a phone in a massive enclosure. Ignoring the no true scotsman argument, I

> and yet, Apple charges for it as if it was a real workstation equipment rather than a phone in a massive enclosure. Ignoring the no true scotsman argument, I'm not sure this is even an insult. Apple improved their phone CPUs to the point where they compete very well in the desktop space and in some workstation (for any meaning of this term) environments. It's what Intel did to traditional workstation vendors long ago, and is classic Innovators Dilemma. Typically that happens from a small startup and not some industry leading company though. Shame on Intel and AMD for not seeing this coming, since it had been telegraphed for years.