5 ms·

For what it's worth, I don't feel it's appropriate to dictate or even advise others on child-rearing decisions, but I don't understand how humanity has a chance

For what it's worth, I don't feel it's appropriate to dictate or even advise others on child-rearing decisions, but I don't understand how humanity has a chance if we all throw our hands up in the air and say: there's no way we'll get Americans to give up their cars, meat, or 2.5 babies. I'm not really advocating anything here, just lamenting the seeming (and somewhat assumed) immutability of it all. (random but I really appreciated these subthreads, definitely some good stuff for me to chew on)

nathan_compton 3y ago
Well, I'm not saying that modification of behavior is impossible, just that "don't have kids" is practically a non-starter. Stiff tax penalties for more than 3 kids is probably something which might become possible if things get pretty bad, for example (I'm sure conservatives would object strongly, however). Carbon taxes/credits are probably possible. Huge public works (build enough solar panels and energy storage station to meet most of our power needs). Big taxes on carmakers for making high emission vehicles, etc. There are lots of policies which can work, and I think the market will, eventually, also probably get there eventually. But just telling people not to have kids is silly.
unsupp0rted 3y ago
> I don't feel it's appropriate to dictate or even advise others on child-rearing decisions Why not? It's appropriate to dictate and even advise on lots of things that are personal/private. We have laws and social norms to keep people from being horrible to their own children, even behind closed doors, but only after those children are born. My suggestion is for those bits of advice, backed by the government's monopoly on force, to kick in just a year earlier than that.
- predictabl3 3y ago
  I'm a big fan of reproductive freedom and I'm not sure how to reconcile that with my thoughts about natalism, so I try to at least stay out of direct advice/condemnation for individuals.
  - unsupp0rted 3y ago
    I also wouldn't tell individuals how to live. I'd support society-level mores and laws though.

nathan_compton 3y ago

Well, I'm not saying that modification of behavior is impossible, just that "don't have kids" is practically a non-starter. Stiff tax penalties for more than 3 kids is probably something which might become possible if things get pretty bad, for example (I'm sure conservatives would object strongly, however). Carbon taxes/credits are probably possible. Huge public works (build enough solar panels and energy storage station to meet most of our power needs). Big taxes on carmakers for making high emission vehicles, etc. There are lots of policies which can work, and I think the market will, eventually, also probably get there eventually. But just telling people not to have kids is silly.

unsupp0rted 3y ago

> I don't feel it's appropriate to dictate or even advise others on child-rearing decisions Why not? It's appropriate to dictate and even advise on lots of things that are personal/private. We have laws and social norms to keep people from being horrible to their own children, even behind closed doors, but only after those children are born. My suggestion is for those bits of advice, backed by the government's monopoly on force, to kick in just a year earlier than that.

predictabl3 3y ago
I'm a big fan of reproductive freedom and I'm not sure how to reconcile that with my thoughts about natalism, so I try to at least stay out of direct advice/condemnation for individuals.
- unsupp0rted 3y ago
  I also wouldn't tell individuals how to live. I'd support society-level mores and laws though.