3 ms·
I disagree. I'm very disappointed that this "necessity" came into existence in the first place. By being forced to install non-free BLOBs to be able to use "ou
by still_grokking 3y ago
I disagree. I'm very disappointed that this "necessity" came into existence in the first place.
By being forced to install non-free BLOBs to be able to use "our" devices we actually admit that we're not the ones who actually control "our" computers. That's admitting full defeat! You're not the owner of "your" devices.
Given that computers are now kind of "brain extensions" this means you're not in control of a substantial part of yourself.
This has quite some implications! And I'm not even thinking about such things like future computer devices connected directly to human brains…
- rollcat 3y agoThen don't buy hardware that requires non-free firmware.
- arp242 3y agoYou don't control the hardware in the first place. Can you modify the microchips on your hardware? Can you modify the printed circuits? Can you modify a ROM in hardware? In all those cases the answer is "not really", short of some spectacular reverse engineering effort and specialized hardware and skills that even most technical users don't have (you can modify anything with enough effort). All this focus on firmware seems rather misplaced.
- 5e92cb50239222b 3y agoLet's not conflate hardware with software. The first one is practically impossible to modify for a completely different reason than the second one (physical limitations and the need for specialized hardware that costs serious money vs artificial limitations imposed by developers). You can at least repair it (unless you bought into the Apple ecosystem — you knew what you were getting into then), and a relative of mine makes good living doing just that.
- arp242 3y agoFirmware is inextricable tied to hardware; you could pretty much say it is hardware. Hardware has had "software" in it for decades and no one complains about it either, except when this software is loaded in a particular fashion.