3 ms·
When AOL came to the Internet it was seen as the apocalypse. But really what killed the internet is spam and scammers. They followed the public because that's w
by mannyv 3y ago
When AOL came to the Internet it was seen as the apocalypse. But really what killed the internet is spam and scammers. They followed the public because that's where the money is.
The problem that's fundamental to the Internet is something nobody wants to say, So I will: the people suck. Not everyone deserves a voice.
The comment sections on WaPo, the NYT, and DailyKos are just as bad as the worst parts of 4chan. And nextoor/facebook? These people are whacked out.
Usenet worked because it was a sub-elite; in the golden era people in usenet were college kids, the highly educated, etc. and even with that there was more self selection, because you needed a computer and the ability to read and write text. And connect to it, which if you weren't in a university was quite difficult.
Is anyone willing to build a service that's got elitism built-in? Clubhouse sort of did. But it needs to be said: allowing anyone to post means dick picks and moderation.
- Aeolun 3y agoIf you make it elite you’ll still have dick picks and moderation. Just less of it. It’d be interesting to see if you could add selection criteria that both scale (automated) and are unable to be gamed (read the answers from some website).
- slamdoors 3y agoI think you nailed it. There’s two parts: 1) educated users and 2) self-/mod-enforced culture. So far, HN hits both. However, even HN is starting to upvote puns, engage in group-think, etc. To fix this you must moderate strongly or only allow material that attracts educated individuals.