3 ms·
Interesting in that I kind of did the opposite. I stayed at one company for a long time, and then moved more around later in my career. Perhaps there is an ar
by mmmm2 3y ago
Interesting in that I kind of did the opposite. I stayed at one company for a long time, and then moved more around later in my career.
Perhaps there is an argument for getting to the "staff" level quickly, and then hop around more as it's harder to advance past that level?
- itake 3y agoIn my own network and in my current role, I see people that should have left years ago, but they never got the hint that their careers stalled. I would have a direct conversation with my manager to see where the growth is and then verify that with action (Are they promoting other people instead of me? If yes, leave.). As far as reaching staff and then jumping ship, I have no idea. I started my career 10 years ago and at the time, I thought "senior" was the highest option, but then staff role got created. I wonder if in 10+ years, the IC ladder will get taller, so people don't feel "trapped" at staff level.
- wonderingyogi 3y agoTitle inflation is a thing even with ladders. I know of some non-tech industries where there are 15 levels to climb and at level 7 you were considered a director already.