3 ms·
Zero specific claims. Zero evidence examined by the person making the allegations. All hearsay. To top it off, the focus of the story, David Charles Grusch, is
by Octokiddie 3y ago
Zero specific claims. Zero evidence examined by the person making the allegations. All hearsay.
To top it off, the focus of the story, David Charles Grusch, is a "a former intelligence official."
Pardom me for disregarding this as the diversion it appears to be. The US military has quite a track record on this kind of thing. It's not hard to think of reasons why such diversions might be deployed right now, either.
Maybe some kind of physical evidence - any physical evidence - will be presented. If so, I'm happy to change my mind. Until then, there's zero compelling reason to believe any of it and every reason to think Grusch either a liar or a stooge.
- nonethewiser 3y agoExtraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
- MacsHeadroom 3y ago> To top it off, the focus of the story, David Charles Grusch, is a "a former intelligence official." "From 2019-2021, he was the representative of the reconnaissance office to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force. From late 2021 to July 2022, he was the co-lead for UAP analysis at the NGA and its representative to the task force." > Zero specific claims. The specific claim is that he has provided to congress documentation on successful non-human craft retrieval programs hidden from congress, under oath. He makes no claims about the projects other than that he was not a part of them and that he was provided said documentation on them. The U.S. Inspector General called the claims "credible and urgent" and congress is planning a session on them.